The meeting started with the board addressing application 24-ZB-35V by Darlene Mumber, who sought to replace a deteriorated shed on Elizabeth Avenue. Mumber explained that the new structure would provide a reliable storage solution for gardening tools. During the public portion, neighbor Ken Bites expressed concerns over what he perceived as preconceptions by the board, questioning the reported square footage in the application. Bites argued that the application contained discrepancies, saying, “They could just go down to town get a permit put a 48 square foot shed no problem.” Chairman K clarified that the board had not yet made a decision and encouraged a fair discussion. Despite Bites’ objections, the board approved Mumber’s application, and a written memorialization was set for the next meeting.

Next, the board considered application 24-ZB-38V by Sherissa, who sought to install a fence around her property for privacy and to protect her garden from deer. Board members discussed potential impacts on township easements and recommended setting the fence back from utility lines. Sherissa agreed to these adjustments, and with no public objections, the board unanimously approved the application, subject to the discussed conditions.

In another significant case, Abdul Shar Muhammad presented his request for a six-foot solid fence on his corner lot, citing security concerns following a burglary on July 7. Muhammad emphasized the need for a secure environment for his children. Board member Jonathan raised concerns about the sight triangle at the intersection of Buttonwood and Crestwood. Muhammad requested a reduction to a 10-foot setback, arguing that the larger setback would limit usable space. After a discussion, it was suggested that Muhammad return with a revised proposal that would angle the fence to maintain clear visibility. The board agreed to carry over the application to the next meeting on September 12.

The board also addressed the application of Par Kumar Ania and PTI MAA, seeking a variance for a new structure close to the property line. The applicants agreed to maintain landscaping and obtain permits for any new outdoor mechanical equipment. Public comments included concerns about potential noise from air conditioning units. After assurances and clarifications, the board unanimously approved the application, with a written memorialization to follow.

Andrean B.’s application for a fire rebuild on New Market Road raised issues concerning code violations, including a second kitchen and an excessive number of bedrooms. Andrean clarified that the plans intended to include a Butler’s pantry, not a second kitchen. His wife, Leslie, explained that the pantry was for storing kitchen equipment, not for cooking. The board requested revised plans to address the building coverage and pantry specifications before revisiting the application in September.

Lastly, the board reviewed the application from the Muslim Center of Middlesex County for a freestanding LED digital sign. The sign’s hours of operation and imagery display had been resolved through a developer’s agreement. With no public objections, the board approved the application, with one member recusing themselves from the vote.