The focal point of the meeting was resolution 22, which proposed an $80,000 total increase in salary for city officials, a move that prompted a public hearing and a debate. Residents challenged the fairness of the proposed raises, particularly against the backdrop of the city’s financial struggles. One resident questioned the source of funds for the raise, stating, “the city is already broke where’s it coming from.” Another resident argued that the raise was not justified by the council’s workload compared to the unpaid efforts of community football coaches who dedicate their time seven days a week.

A former council member added to the discourse, stressing the importance of public service over personal gain and warning against decisions that could adversely impact the city’s financial health. “Shut it down; it’s the only reasonable, fair, and equitable thing to do,” the former council member implored. Moreover, residents like Marvin Ro emphasized the city’s oath of office, which stipulates that council members should not personally benefit from their decisions.

The pushback against the raise was encapsulated by the words of Maxine Christmas, who pointed to the dedication of football coaches as an example of true service, contrasting their lack of compensation with the substantial increase sought by the council. The community’s sentiment mirrored by another resident who stressed, “You take an oath of office, and the oath of office is to say that you are not to benefit from anything that you do or the decisions that you make.”

Beyond the salary debate, the meeting also tackled other topics, such as the implementation of resolution 23, which sought to amend an agreement with the county of Atlantic for the installation and maintenance of flashing signal equipment. This was proposed due to delays attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, with the county requesting an extension to move forward with the project. Additionally, resolution 25 was discussed, expressing support for the closure of Decada Avenue by the New Jersey Department of Transportation to enhance traffic safety at the intersection of Route N and Blackwood Pike.

Resolution 26 addressed the city’s corrective action plan for its 2022 budget, while resolution involved an amended agreement of sale and a reinstated redevelopment deal with Savage Collaborations LLC concerning the California Avenue Redevelopment plan. The latter prompted inquiries from the council about the specifics of the agreement and its long-term implications for city development.

Concerns about financial prudence extended to the review of bills paid between council meetings. Large payments for infrastructure and software services were scrutinized, and public comments reflected unease with the city’s financial management, particularly when compared to the needs for street cleaning and infrastructure maintenance. One individual highlighted salary disparities between Pleasantville officials and those in neighboring cities, calling for an evaluation of resource allocation.

The council also grappled with the need for better communication and follow-through on promises, as exemplified by discussions surrounding the Pleasantville Jokers, a youth organization. Council member Carla Thomas advocated for more support for the group, emphasizing the challenges faced by the Pleasantville Track Team.

Council member Bert Correa and Joanne Famularo addressed the living conditions of immigrant families near the North Main Street School. Concerns were also raised about the safety of children during school arrival and dismissal times, with council member Ricky Cistrunk advocating for increased police presence.

The debate over raises overshadowed a discussion on the purchase of new trucks for the city yard, with some council members and public attendees suggesting funds would be better allocated to employee raises given current service deficiencies.