The Plymouth County Energy Aggregation Program was a focal point of the meeting, with Mr. Basler presenting an overview of ongoing discussions with town officials and consultants. The initiative aims to lower energy costs by consolidating purchasing power, similar to the Cape Cod Light Compact. Basler highlighted that 21 of the 27 communities in the county currently have aggregation programs, while three maintain their own power plants and are not eligible for the county’s initiative. The current county energy cost stands at 12.195 cents per kilowatt hour, compared to a high of 17.723 cents in certain areas. The program’s success hinges on collective action from participating communities, though this could limit the number of energy retailers interested in bidding.

Questions arose regarding the structure of energy bills, with Basler clarifying that the program would address service charges but not delivery charges, which are tied to infrastructure maintenance. Rising delivery costs, driven by state energy efficiency initiatives, have increased overall bills for residents. The fee structure for consultants, who would not charge the county directly but rather assess a minimal fee per kilowatt hour to customers, was also examined. Discussion touched on potential support from the Department of Energy Resources, which could provide technical grants to aid the program.

Next, the commissioners addressed the allocation of ARPA funds, a topic that sparked considerable debate. A communication from the U.S. Treasury underscored the importance of compliant fund management, with commissioners expressing confidence in their operations. The board deliberated over distributing $2,413,180.62 in remaining funds, deciding to allocate approximately 50% of requested amounts to ten communities with pre-obligated applications. Concerns about fairness and the potential for “winners and losers” in this process led to discussions on whether to apply an overarching percentage or assess each application individually.

The treasurer explained that communities had already committed their own funds to projects, with ARPA funds serving as reimbursements. This raised questions about how projects would proceed if communities couldn’t secure additional funding. The treasurer assured that the strategy allowed room for reallocating any returned funds. A motion was made to authorize the 50% allocation plan, but hesitance remained, particularly regarding the Mobile Integrated Health (MIH) program. Despite recognizing MIH’s benefits, reluctance from towns to invest without county contributions was noted.

The meeting also covered updates from the extension office, highlighting a successful agricultural day at the state house where 4-H program participants advocated for the absenteeism bill. The implications of a lottery bill affecting agricultural and technical schools were discussed, with light-hearted remarks about legislative speed in addressing educational opportunities. Tick season was another point of concern, with discussions on the dangers posed by deer and lone star ticks, the latter causing dietary restrictions in affected individuals.

A treasury report from Mr. O’Brien noted the OPED fund’s resilience, maintaining a positive return despite challenges. Maintenance and administration updates included significant investments and ongoing renovations, notably the 32 Belmont Street project slated for May 31 completion. The board also planned an upcoming leadership executive dinner, deciding to start with a meal to encourage attendance and social interaction.