Point Pleasant Beach Council Grapples with Flood Zone Variances

The Point Pleasant Beach Borough Council meeting raised concerns over the issuance of variances in flood zones. The discussions were dominated by a proposal for a new home design, which requested several variances, including ones for an elevated house with impervious pavers, a chimney setback, and a deck. The council grappled with the potential impact of these variances on flood insurance rates and safety.

A property on the corner of Trenton Avenue and St. Louis Avenue was at the forefront of the council’s agenda. The owners, property holders since 1978, faced a notice of violation in 2022 for allegedly non-compliant use. They argued for a two-family residence status, supported by historical documents and a former code enforcement officer’s testimony. After substantial deliberation, the council granted a certificate of nonconforming use for the property’s three units.

The debate continued over the new home design, with council members divided on whether to grant the requested variances. The proposal, which aimed to comply with regulations by reducing variances and making adjustments, included an elevated living level to minimize stairs and provide outdoor space. Despite the proposed impervious coverage being below the allowed limit, concerns were raised about the size of the house and the addition of a deck. The architect’s testimony highlighted efforts to integrate the home aesthetically into the neighborhood while addressing flood zone considerations.

Public comments revealed a divide between the representative advocating for the project’s aesthetic and functional benefits and council members wary of the potential consequences. The representative argued for the upscale look of impervious pavers and the creative contribution of the design to the community, while seeking the board’s approval for the variances. However, concerns were raised about the implications for the town’s Community Rating System (CRS) score, which affects flood insurance premiums, and the precedent set by repeatedly granting variances.

An additional proposal presented by a professional planner from East Coast Engineering introduced a cabana addition to a new home. Emphasizing the design’s compliance with setback requirements and its alignment with the master plan’s objectives, the planner argued that the cabana would not impact neighborhood views or density and would enhance the visual environment. The council and public scrutinized the proposal, with inquiries about the cabana’s use and its regulatory compliance.

As the community confronts the realities of climate change and rising sea levels, the council must navigate the challenges of supporting growth while ensuring the safety and well-being of its residents.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: