A primary focus of the meeting was on water allocation for new developments, a topic of significant interest given the potential impact on future projects. It was noted that water supply for new residential units would be determined based on occupancy, rather than a fixed number of hookups, aligning with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJ DEP) guidelines. Uncertainty lingered regarding specific flow capacities approved by the NJ DEP, and it was emphasized that each building would receive allocations based on its size and type. This nuanced approach ensures that while existing residential properties might not alter the flow, new developments could have a substantial impact on water usage.

This assessment is important for developers to understand before proceeding with their projects.

Another topic was the resolution concerning the Washington building on WQ Avenue. The board focused on the building’s development plan, which includes eight residential units on the second floor and six commercial units on the first floor. The proposal, which was conforming and did not require any alterations to the current redevelopment plan, emphasized enhancements such as recessed doors for the building’s facade. Importantly, no tax exemptions were sought by the developer, and the board approved a contribution of approximately $200 per unit towards the executive director’s expenses.

The members also discussed the necessity of a developer’s agreement to outline crucial aspects such as construction staging and noise management. Questions were raised regarding compliance with bathroom regulations during the construction process. It was clarified that while the bathrooms would remain functional, any necessary renovations would occur once new tenants occupied the units. The discussion also touched on the interim cost agreement, with escrow amounts expected to be around $10,000, pending final determination.

Efforts to create design standards for redevelopment projects were highlighted, with collaboration between the Redevelopment Agency, Planning Board, and Council. A planner, Kristen, was hired to facilitate this initiative, focusing on maintaining a cohesive aesthetic for future developments.

The meeting also addressed the relationship between the Redevelopment Agency and the Municipal Utilities Authority (MUA), particularly regarding the number of remaining connections available for redevelopment. A figure of 150 connections was mentioned, although it was acknowledged that the agency cannot control the MUA’s operations or decisions. The agency emphasized that addressing these logistical aspects early is essential to avoid complications during project timelines.

Public comments included a councilmember expressing admiration for design standards seen in other municipalities, prompting discussion about the Washington building’s basement. It was confirmed that the basement would retain its current usage, balancing storage and commercial functions without expanding office space.