The proposed affordable housing development, which received preliminary approvals from various agencies, was the centerpiece of the meeting. The project involves the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a new building, specifically designed for senior living, with a portion of the housing dedicated to veterans. The board addressed the need for the project to comply with all D permits and stormwater management regulations. The developers also acknowledged the need to balance the project’s financial constraints with the regulatory requirements and practical considerations inherent to the development of affordable housing.

During the discussion, the developers and board members delved into the specifics of the project, including the trash collection route, the placement of dumpsters, and the route for collection trucks. Concerns about the project’s landscaping needs were raised, especially in terms of the parking lot and street trees, which are mandated by the Redevelopment Plan. The board also inquired about the color of the vinyl fence, expressing a preference for a darker hue to better blend with the surroundings and satisfy aesthetic concerns.

The board and developers engaged in a detailed exchange regarding the height of light poles in the parking lot, the type of fence along Locust Street, and the potential glare from fixtures affecting pedestrians and drivers. In response to concerns about the environmental impact due to the site’s previous use as a Department of Public Works facility, the developers confirmed that environmental site assessments had been conducted.

Safety considerations were also a priority, with discussions on the location and accessibility of the fire department connection (FDC), hydrants, the design of water mains, and the need for a generator, especially considering the senior housing aspect of the project. The developers considered the placement of another FDC on Ringwood Avenue; however, they cited cost and logistics as challenges. Furthermore, the board discussed the placement of electric vehicle (EV) parking spaces, the design of the senior housing project, and the possibility of the county donating labor for tree planting and the installation of a transfer switch for a future generator.

The developers assured the board that the building would have a fully suppressed design, fulfilling safety standards for fire prevention, and that the housing units would meet minimum standard requirements. They also discussed the possibility of making EV charging stations available to the public and addressed questions about the use of condensers, ventilation requirements, and the fire suppression system. The color coordination of grills, presence of a 24-hour person on site, and compliance with review letters from the planner and engineer were also covered.

The board outlined several conditions for the project, such as the submission of revised plans, the provision of sign details, and collaboration with the fire department for the optimal placement of hydrants and FDCs. Acknowledging the project’s financial challenges, the architect highlighted the focus on providing housing for veterans and the difficulties faced by the VA in caring for veterans with long-term issues. The board expressed its support for the project, emphasizing its positive impact on the community.

In addition to the housing project discussion, the board approved a resolution related to Pi Holdings LLC and addressed the progress of a downtown construction project. It was noted that one new project had commenced with proper permits, while another was halted due to unauthorized construction work. The board also discussed the appointment of a new member to the master plan committee and the importance of properly filing important documents with the county.