The primary focus of the Zoning Board meeting was the application BOA25-09 submitted by Eric Richardson, who sought approval to install a semi-inground pool in his backyard. Richardson described the pool as a “glorified above-ground pool,” emphasizing its minimal invasiveness due to reduced excavation requirements. He highlighted his roots in Pompton Lakes and his desire to create a better environment for his children, stating, “I just thought like, you know, I’ve had a lot, they’ve had in their life. So, why not try to make one of their dreams come true?”

Richardson’s application faced scrutiny, particularly concerning the pool’s placement and its adherence to zoning regulations. The discussion focused on the pool’s proximity to property lines and existing structures, such as a garage adjacent to Richardson’s property. Board members noted that a variance would be required regardless of the pool’s location due to its proximity to property lines, with the distance from the property line and the garage being critical factors.

A neighbor, Sandra Ulrich, voiced her concerns about the pool’s proposed placement. Ulrich objected to the request for a 2-foot-7-and-a-half-inch setback from her side property line, fearing it could negatively impact potential property sales and homeowner insurance due to possible drainage issues. She articulated that while she did not oppose pools generally, the specific encroachment posed by Richardson’s plan was problematic. Ulrich highlighted her family’s long-standing ties to the neighborhood and the historical significance of her property.

The Zoning Board explored the possibility of shifting the pool closer to the garage to better comply with setback requirements. However, this adjustment would still necessitate two variances due to the property’s layout, with distances stipulated at 12 feet and 10 feet from the property line and garage, respectively. The board’s legal counsel explained that if the application were approved, a resolution would be prepared for the next meeting, allowing time to investigate the compliance of the existing garage.

In addition to the pool discussion, the meeting addressed community projects, particularly the ongoing upgrades at Willow Field and Hersville Park. The Willow Field project involves enhancements to soccer and baseball fields, with tree clearing already underway and planting set to follow. The board expressed enthusiasm for these improvements.

Similarly, Hersville Park saw progress with the installation of new tables, jungle gyms, and potentially a rock climbing wall. The board discussed resurfacing the basketball court with an acrylic material but acknowledged budget constraints and timing as potential challenges. The possibility of hosting a community ceremony to celebrate the upgrades was considered to honor the park’s historical significance for long-term residents.

Lakeside Park projects, including pavilion roof repairs and necessary electrical and ADA compliance upgrades, were also discussed. The board acknowledged funding limitations, emphasizing that any future projects must align with budgetary constraints.