The committee explored the potential overhaul of the threshold for severely damaged structures, considering a reduction from 50% to 40% of the pre-damaged assessment value. This change aims to enhance the city’s responsiveness and efficiency in post-disaster scenarios. By lowering the threshold, more structures could qualify for aid and reconstruction efforts post-disaster, expediting community recovery.

Debate arose over whether to incorporate sea level rise into the comprehensive emergency management plan or create a standalone document. The outcome of this debate could affect the city’s long-term preparedness for rising sea levels and associated environmental challenges.

The committee also highlighted the engagement of the community and its partners in conservation efforts and coastal management. The importance of public education and coordination with partners was stressed, with the committee examining various initiatives from a list of 49 items.

An upcoming open house event was reviewed, which is set to feature public engagement stations to discuss the Community Vision and the history of the Waterfront District. The committee recognized the event as a critical opportunity to gather input and reflect on the changes since the original 1998 vision, considering demographic shifts and technological progress.

In response to a public concern about the tediousness of an online survey, the committee debated ways to improve community involvement in decision-making processes, including the use of social media and an annual newsletter for hurricane preparedness. Additionally, the committee discussed the importance of reevaluating current zoning categories within the planning area, which include waterfront commercial, general commercial, two-family residential, and multiple-family residential zones.

The committee delved into the zoning districts and density regulations, particularly for the Waterfront Commercial and C3 areas. Confusion about the specific density allowances for C2 and C3 zoning in the Waterfront District was noted, with a resolution to this confusion being essential for future development plans.

Furthering community engagement, the committee detailed a passport program that incentivizes public participation in city events and planning discussions. Participants could visit various locations, receive stamps, and potentially win grocery store gift cards, effectively encouraging greater involvement in local governance.

Lastly, the committee faced the logistical challenge of scheduling the next meeting to review survey results and report to the city council. Conflicting schedules among members made it difficult to find a suitable date.