05:41The discussion on the Updike Farmstead centered on an application from the Historical Society of Princeton to demolish and reconstruct the lean-to of the wagon shed barn due to structural concerns. The Historical Society’s attorney confirmed compliance with notice and publication requirements. The commission reviewed the proposal, which included replacing failing diamond-shaped asphalt shingles with new ones of similar design, and replacing the barn’s deteriorating foundation with a new concrete block foundation. Plans also called for removing the roof down to the framing due to structural issues and replacing it with thermally modified wood to prevent future rot.

28:51A key point of contention was the historical significance of the barn. One participant expressed doubts about the project’s necessity, arguing that the structure, classified as a wagon house crib, did not meet traditional definitions of a barn. They emphasized preserving unique features such as mortise holes and raising holes. Concerns about the building’s age and historical integrity were raised, with calls for a comprehensive restoration approach that preserved historical elements rather than creating a false impression with new framing.

In contrast, the urgency of the barn’s structural issues was underscored by reports of movement in the foundation and the risk of imminent failure. The need to balance historical preservation with immediate repairs was a recurring theme.

01:37:35The council’s deliberation on the Nassau Presbyterian Church focused on a proposal to replace auxiliary double doors to improve safety and energy efficiency. The new design included a wider single steel door with a sidelight and a transom. The application aimed to address security concerns, as the current doors were not weather-tight and required frequent repairs. While some members expressed concerns about the aesthetics of the new design, the applicant emphasized the need for a practical solution that aligned with safety recommendations from local police.

Council members debated the proposal’s visual impact, with suggestions for a more cohesive design that aligned with the existing architectural style. The practicality of a centered door without sidelights was considered, with an inclination to approve the design if it met practical and aesthetic requirements.

Another discussion involved the proposed design changes for a building on Harrison Street. The revised plan aimed to address previous concerns by adjusting the addition’s location and layout. Changes included turning parking stalls to improve access and enhancing visual separation between properties with landscaping. The revised design also featured a smaller patio and a foyer for barrier-free access.

The council considered the architectural integrity of the historic building, with concerns about potential impacts from design changes.