A key topic was the proposed addition to the building on Nassau Street, which aims to mirror the architectural style of a nearby property on Nassau. The plan includes a gable roof with a standing seam metal roof and decorative brackets, as well as various window types intended to maintain a consistent aesthetic with the existing structures. However, the proposal also involves changes to the current property layout, such as the removal of 39 European hornbeam trees and the reconfiguration of the parking lot to include ADA-compliant spaces. These changes have prompted concerns about maintaining the area’s historical integrity.

Commission members expressed reservations about the materials and design elements suggested for the addition, emphasizing the need for compatibility with the historic character of the existing building. The proposed placement of new condenser units and the addition’s proximity to Nassau Street were points of contention, with some arguing that these features could detract from the building’s historic appeal. The commission also requested further analysis of the site’s archaeological significance, given the area’s rich historical context.

The meeting also addressed the broader implications of the proposed development on the neighborhood, particularly in terms of safety and accessibility. Plans to relocate a telephone pole and adjust site access were discussed as measures to enhance safety while preserving the historic district’s character. The proposal includes a shared plaza with a fountain, intended to serve as a communal space connecting the two properties, though this element was critiqued for its potential visual impact on the historic setting.

Further discussions focused on the architectural details of the addition, with some members questioning the appropriateness of the proposed color scheme and materials. The commission emphasized the importance of maintaining a clear distinction between the historic and new structures. There was consensus that the building’s facade and overall design should reflect a contemporary interpretation of traditional styles, preserving the neighborhood’s architectural history.

Speakers highlighted the historical significance of the properties involved, noting their ties to early American history and the importance of maintaining the original architectural elements. There was a strong sentiment that any new development should respect the site’s historical context and contribute positively to the community’s character.

The commission concluded the meeting by emphasizing the need for a review of the proposed changes. It was suggested that the applicant should return for further reviews, incorporating feedback from both the commission and the public to ensure that the development aligns with Princeton’s historic preservation standards.