The meeting marked a notable moment for the 21 Wiggins Street development, as the Planning Board addressed modifications to the original site plan approved in December 2021. Project representatives outlined changes such as room size adjustments, addition of balconies, and alterations to mechanical and bike rooms, all while maintaining alignment with smart growth principles. Despite the routine nature of the extension request due to COVID-19 and economic delays, the board ensured these modifications adhered to Princeton’s zoning requirements.

A key issue was the compliance with newly implemented housing affordability controls, requiring careful consideration of the Affordable Housing (AH1) zoning district provisions. Concerns were raised about the potential need for applicants to revise plans due to minor discrepancies in unit sizes, with sentiments expressed that it would be unfair under the current circumstances. The board proposed extending the approval period by a year, allowing flexibility for minor room size variations while maintaining compliance with state guidelines.

Further discussions centered on the implications of the new hack regulations, which dictate minimum standards for affordable units. The board debated the impact of sending the applicant back for revisions if the plans did not meet these updated rules post-approval. The consensus was to allow staff to work directly with the applicant, ensuring compliance without necessitating a return to the board, thus streamlining the process.

The dialogue highlighted potential conflicts between staff and architectural calculations for bike parking. A condition was suggested to align the architect’s plans with staff assessments, emphasizing the importance of accurate and compliant bicycle storage solutions. Additionally, board members discussed aesthetic improvements, such as adding windows to the north side of the building to enhance visual appeal and desirability.

The board’s deliberations on affordable housing compliance revealed concerns over setting precedents that might lead other developers to seek similar exemptions. Board members emphasized the need for a collaborative approach between staff and applicants to address any issues arising from regulatory changes.

As an outcome, the Planning Board unanimously approved the site plan modification with specific conditions, including the commitment to work with staff on compliance with the new affordable housing rules. The approval also accounted for architectural design improvements, such as window placements and landscaping adjustments, which were to be reviewed by the municipal landscape architect.