The redevelopment proposal from King Interests LLC involves both properties, which contribute to the historical significance of the area. The board was presented with plans to renovate the building on Nassau Street, originally built in 1730, and to add a 518-square-foot extension. This addition would not be visible from Nassau Street but would impact the North Harrison Street view. Both properties are located in the RO (Residence Office) zone and are part of the Jugtown Historic District.

Justin, a representative at the meeting, detailed the specifics of the project, pointing out that the proposed changes included connecting the parking lots of both properties and adding landscaping elements, including a new fountain. However, the HPC raised several concerns about these plans, particularly regarding the historical integrity of the site. The commission strongly recommended denying the application due to several issues: the proposed recladding of the front steps, the new structure’s proximity to the street, and design elements that failed to relate to the original building’s features. They argued that the new plaza with a fountain appeared too commercial for the historic site and criticized the removal of hornbeam trees, which they valued highly.

The HPC suggested a concept review process, a free exchange of information that they believed would benefit the applicant. They insisted that any new structure should be positioned to avoid overshadowing the historic building, maintaining its prominence in the landscape.

In response to these concerns, the applicant’s representative acknowledged the feedback and expressed an intent to redesign the project to align better with the HPC’s concerns. The revised plans are expected to be presented at a later date.

The meeting also addressed logistical concerns related to traffic patterns and site accessibility. Planning representatives expressed a commitment to preserving existing hornbeam shrubs and trees while tackling concerns about site navigability. Gravel paving was suggested to discourage through traffic. The possibility of widening the existing 14-foot-wide driveway, considered narrow for two-way traffic, was discussed, although past issues had been minimal due to low traffic volume.

Public comments played a role in the meeting, with residents voicing their concerns about the proposed redevelopment. Donald Denny, a local resident, highlighted his apprehension about setback variances and potential traffic congestion at the intersection of Nassau and Harrison streets, a concern echoed by other residents. Clifford Zinc, an architect with expertise in historic preservation, emphasized the importance of preserving existing door openings in the stone structure to avoid damage during renovations. Katherine Knight and Margaret Deen Brock, both residents, stressed the importance of maintaining the site’s historical significance while addressing ongoing traffic and safety issues.

Following the public comments, the board acknowledged the input and outlined the next steps. The planning board’s consideration of these plans would follow the commission’s review, contingent on when the revised plans are submitted. The board emphasized the importance of informing neighbors about upcoming meetings.