The meeting’s primary focus was the contentious application for a new drug and alcohol rehabilitation center slated to occupy the former nursing home site in the Office Research district (O1 zone). The applicant, represented by attorney Michael Lario, sought a variance due to regulatory differences between nursing homes and rehabilitation facilities. The board previously determined that a site plan application and conditional use authorization were necessary, given the distinct licensing requirements under New Jersey state regulations.

The proposed facility, managed by Bokeh, aims to offer comprehensive rehabilitation services without altering the existing structure, a 64,000-square-foot building on a 6.2-acre site. The applicant assured that the facility would not expand physically, maintaining the site’s current footprint. Lario emphasized that the variance was solely to address licensing discrepancies, asserting that operational characteristics would mirror those of the previous nursing home, thus minimizing community disruption.

During public comments, local residents voiced apprehensions about security implications and the potential impact on neighborhood safety and property values. Paul Ree and Steve Shu, among others, articulated concerns regarding the facility’s proximity to residential areas and its perceived negative connotations compared to a nursing home. They questioned whether adequate security measures were in place to ensure the safety of children and the broader community.

Dr. Allison Tarlo, the facility’s chief clinical officer, addressed these concerns by detailing the facility’s operational protocols. She clarified that it would cater to adults seeking voluntary treatment for substance use disorders, emphasizing a pre-assessment process to ensure patient suitability. The facility would not accept state-funded patients and would operate with enhanced security measures, including monitored outdoor access and continuous staff supervision to maintain community safety.

In response to landscaping queries, the applicant committed to adhere to a previously approved landscaping plan, which includes maintaining a buffer to minimize visibility and light pollution. The board discussed the importance of these measures in preserving neighborhood aesthetics and mitigating residents’ concerns.

After thorough deliberation, the board voted to approve the facility’s conditional use authorization, with one dissenting vote. This decision came with stipulated conditions, including compliance with security and landscaping requirements to address public concerns.

Following the rehabilitation facility’s approval, the board proceeded to other agenda items, including a proposal for a covered porch on Prospect Avenue. The applicants sought a variance due to exceeding the maximum allowable floor area ratio. Public opposition highlighted concerns over noise and privacy, especially given the porch’s features like a fireplace and television. The board deferred a final decision, allowing the applicants to revise their proposal in response to community feedback.

Another notable discussion centered on the property on Western Way, where the applicants requested variances for a floor area ratio and parking setback. The proposed modifications included converting a garage bay into a mudroom, necessitating parking adjustments. The unusual lot shape and existing zoning non-compliance were pivotal factors in the board’s evaluation. The board agreed to continue the hearing, allowing time for additional considerations and submissions.