A primary focus of the meeting was a variance application for a property on Evelyn Place that involved a front yard setback violation. The applicant’s representative explained that the setback miscalculation resulted in the foundation being two feet closer to the property line than permitted. Despite this, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) did not object, citing that the design preserved the neighborhood’s historical integrity. The architect elaborated on the property’s setbacks, mentioning the unique curvature of the street that complicated compliance with zoning regulations. The design included an overhanging porch, which was permissible within the setback area, but a corner of the house itself intruded into the setback.

The board considered the application’s merits, including the environmental considerations during construction to protect nearby trees and the minor nature of the setback deviation. The applicant argued that the design enhanced the aesthetic appeal of the street and aligned with conservation objectives. The board engaged in discussions about the variance’s implications, focusing on the unique characteristics of the lot and its minimal impact on the neighborhood. Ultimately, the board approved the variance, recognizing the lot’s unique conditions and the aesthetic benefits of the design.

Another topic was a discussion on a property on North Harrison Street, where applicants sought variances to construct a single-family dwelling. The property, represented by an architect, Ricardo Perez, required C1 and C2 variances due to its non-conforming lot width and frontage. The new construction would largely retain the existing house’s footprint, with plans to demolish a one-car garage and carport for an addition. The architect presented the proposal, highlighting that neighboring lots were similarly undersized, and no additional variances were sought beyond the lot dimensions. The board examined the proposal, considering its alignment with the Princeton master plan and its impact on the neighborhood. After deliberation, the board approved the variances, allowing the project to proceed.

Additionally, the meeting addressed a variance application concerning a garage setback and sideyard adjustments on Hillale Road. The applicant revised the proposal to meet neighbors’ concerns regarding drainage, presenting plans to extend an existing curb wall and add a landscaping berm. The modifications aimed to manage stormwater effectively, and neighbors expressed satisfaction with the revisions. However, debates ensued over the requested garage setback variance, with public comments emphasizing the importance of enforcing existing zoning requirements. Ultimately, the applicant agreed to adjust the garage to comply with the five-foot setback requirement, eliminating the need for a variance.