During the truth and taxation hearing, the proposed property tax levy for taxes payable in 2026 was a focal point. Executive Director of Business Services, Ryder, outlined the statutory requirements of the hearing and presented the proposed levy, explaining its components and the projected overall increase of 4.7%. This increase, particularly the 9.8% rise in the debt service fund, caused concern among attendees, prompting clarification that the hike is linked to bond payments approved over time.

Ryder detailed the financial framework of the district, highlighting how 80% of funding is derived from state sources, with the remainder from local property taxes and federal funding. The district’s expenditure breakdown revealed that a portion, 78.9%, is allocated to salaries and benefits, aligning with common practices across school districts.

The public was provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed levy, but no comments were recorded during this segment. Instead, the focus shifted to the recognition of fall sports achievements, with Director Jeff Marshall celebrating student-athletes who participated in state competitions, emphasizing the role of co-curricular activities in student development.

Among the celebrated teams, the girls’ soccer team had a noteworthy season, advancing to the state semifinals and securing third place in the state tournament. The adapted soccer team, participating in a cooperative program, also performed admirably, finishing fourth in their state tournament. Other sports achievements included the girls’ volleyball team reaching the state championship match and the cross-country teams’ commendable performances at the conference and state levels.

The meeting also addressed adjustments to the school calendar, with proposed changes stirring debate among board members. The calendar committee suggested making November 3rd a non-student contact day due to the operational challenges posed by concurrent election activities in school facilities. The extension of spring break and its timing also drew discussion, with concerns about its impact on instructional days and student continuity.

Board members expressed differing views on balancing community input with educational priorities. The safety of students during election days was a particular concern, with discussions on how to manage polling activities alongside regular school operations. The proposal to maintain November 3rd as a professional development day was met with support, emphasizing the importance of student safety and minimizing disruptions.

The meeting progressed to budgetary discussions, focusing on the handling of purchase orders exceeding $25,000 and the district’s adherence to financial protocols. Questions about the potential adjustments to Long-Term Facility Maintenance (LTFM) funding and the use of levy dollars were raised, highlighting the district’s need for capital expenditures and the importance of strategic financial management.

As the meeting drew to a close, the board addressed organizational matters, including preparations for the upcoming January meeting, committee assignments, and leadership roles. The recognition of retirements and the approval of the UHL contract for a new building automation system were also part of the proceedings.