The proposal for a property on Independence Drive, represented by Adam Costa, involves transforming part of the Rison Hotel into a pizza restaurant while converting hotel rooms into residential apartments. The development aims to enhance the local economy by providing new dining options and housing units. However, the Chelmsford Planning Board received numerous comments from various departments, including the DPW and fire department, which highlighted outstanding issues that needed addressing. These included the need for clear labeling of utilities, compliance with fire protection standards, and the provision of appropriate sewer connections.

Safety was a recurring theme during the discussions, with board members expressing concerns about the lack of designated walkways for children accessing a nearby bus stop. It was pointed out that without proper pedestrian infrastructure, children might have to navigate through areas frequented by moving vehicles, posing significant safety risks. The board emphasized the necessity of addressing these safety concerns before the project could move forward.

Further complicating the conversation were concerns from nearby residents about stormwater runoff from neighboring properties causing erosion problems. The representative for the development acknowledged the issue and proposed installing a guardrail along the boundary to manage stormwater flow and stabilize the slope. Despite these measures, there was a consensus among board members on the need for ongoing monitoring to mitigate future stormwater issues effectively.

Another major topic was the proposal for an outdoor contractor’s yard on Riverneck Road, which sparked debate. The project, situated in an industrial zone, prompted concerns from residents about increased truck traffic, noise pollution, and the potential environmental impact on local aquifers. Residents like Eric Finny and Sean Campbell voiced their apprehensions, emphasizing the incompatibility of the contractor yard with the residential nature of the area and highlighting the risks posed by larger vehicles navigating the narrow, winding roads.

The applicant’s representative defended the project, citing its adherence to local bylaws and the economic benefits it would bring to the town. They argued that the project would generate significant tax revenue without adding new residents or burdening local schools. However, the board remained cautious, emphasizing the need to balance economic development with community safety and environmental preservation.

The meeting also touched on procedural discussions concerning other projects and special conditions for affirmative decisions. Notably, the board agreed to continue discussions on the mixed-use development and the contractor’s yard at the next meeting, scheduled for November 12th, to allow for a review of all the issues raised.