The council also addressed a proposed text amendment to the Putnam County Land Development Code, which involved revisions to several articles. These amendments were primarily a cleanup effort to address errors and confusing language from a prior amendment. Noteworthy within these changes was the proposed elimination of the special use permit requirement for emergency services across various zoning districts. The amendment aimed to make emergency services more accessible; however, a public member expressed concerns about removing the requirement, arguing it could lead to emergency facilities being located anywhere without public input. Despite this, planning staff maintained that the changes were intended to enhance public safety and welfare, with oversight remaining through the administrative deviation committee.

Another topic was the regulation of recreational vehicles (RVs) as temporary shelters. The council debated a proposed amendment that stated RVs should not be stored or left on vacant properties. Concerns were raised about the proposed time limits for RVs on lots, with suggestions to align private RV regulations with those of RV parks, allowing for longer stays. Participants emphasized the economic challenges affecting housing affordability, advocating for regulations that consider the community’s needs without penalizing responsible property owners.

The council considered revisions to the Land Development Code, focusing on regulations for artificial ponds, mobile home parks, and roadway classifications. A consensus emerged about treating man-made ponds similarly to natural water bodies to prevent hazardous situations. Revisions to mobile home park regulations included removing requirements for emergency storm shelters and adjusting impervious surface allowances in the Residential 2 zoning district. Additionally, the council discussed eliminating distinctions between major and minor collector roads, highlighting the need for clarity in the code to prevent future confusion.

Throughout these discussions, the council also addressed the process of appealing decisions made by the County Surveyor, particularly regarding lot splits. Proposed changes aimed to expedite the review process by allowing certified professional surveyors to approve subdivisions, reducing wait times. Amendments also included clarifications to definitions within the code, with a focus on ensuring consistency and reducing bureaucratic hurdles.