Putnam County Planning Commission Backs Zoning Amendments for New Developments

The Putnam County Planning Commission unanimously approved two zoning amendment requests that could pave the way for a new vehicle storage facility in Melrose and a single-family home in Crescent City. Both cases will next be reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners on May 27th.

05:22The most notable discussion centered around the zoning amendment request by Michael Thompson. Thompson seeks to rezone a 3.8-acre parcel on North State Road 21 in Melrose from agriculture to commercial general C3. This change would allow for the development of a large vehicle storage facility. Thompson, who already operates a mini storage facility across the street, explained that this expansion is necessary due to the growing demand. The commission found that the proposed zoning aligns with the area’s future land use designation and the county’s comprehensive plan, thus recommending its approval.

10:17In another key agenda item, the commission reviewed a zoning amendment application submitted by Robert and Margaret Mara. The request involves changing the zoning of a 2.8-acre parcel on Smith Lane in Crescent City from commercial neighborhood C1 to residential 2 R2. This change is intended to facilitate the development of a single-family home. The land, previously used as a fish camp, had seen unsuccessful attempts at revitalization. The commission agreed to waive the application fee for the Maras, acknowledging their previous unsuccessful rezoning efforts. The proposal was deemed consistent with the county’s comprehensive plan and unanimously approved.

17:43Additionally, the commission addressed internal matters about member compensation and procedural updates. It was noted that there has been some inconsistency in the timing of board member compensation. A proposal was made to standardize payments to biannual distributions, which the members appeared to accept. The resignation of a staff member, Jenny Kidd, was announced, with a replacement set to begin shortly.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: