A representative of the Navy presented strong objections to the development, citing the incompatibility of residential development with operations at Pine Castle Range Complex and highlighting the safety risks for military air crews and residents. The Navy’s stance, supported by documentation and a map of the range compatibility zones, emphasized the potential risks associated with the proposed rezoning.

The property owner, in response to these objections, insisted on the legitimacy of a pre-existing helipad and expressed respect for the Navy’s position while urging the Planning Commission to approve the staff’s recommendation. This prompted members to seek clarity on their role in the decision-making process, focusing on rezoning rather than the development itself.

Further complicating the matter were the concerns raised by residents and speakers during the public comments section. Judith York spoke in support of the developer, Mr. Pepper, praising his record and the potential for high-value homes on Hog Island. Conversely, Karen Harvey Borg raised concerns about increased traffic and parking issues, which would be exacerbated by the development of 22 houses. The residents’ input highlighted the dichotomy of opinions on the development’s impact on the community.

The discussion extended to the implications of the development on infrastructure, with apprehensions about increased traffic and the need for a ferry service to the island. One speaker emphasized the importance of planning to address emergency services and public safety concerns such as fire safety and medical services. The debate also touched upon the preservation of the area’s quiet environment and the status of an existing dock on the southeast part of the island.

The Planning Commission grappled with the ramifications of the expired Planned Unit Development (PUD) on the island. Questions about legal liability, the county’s responsibilities in the event of mishaps, and the validity of the parcels for development were central to the debate.

Additionally, the commission approved the rezoning with certain members voicing concerns about the project’s future. The meeting also addressed the Land Development Code revision, with the commission awaiting a proposal from a consultant. Upcoming applications for rezone, minor subdivision plot, and a planned unit development for a lot lease community were also briefly mentioned.