The most prominent topic was the zoning map amendment request by CR28 Real Estate Holdings LLC for a substantial 356-acre tract in Hawthorne. This proposal sought to shift the zoning from a planned unit development (PUD) to an agricultural estate, permitting the land’s use for agricultural purposes. The staff recommended approval, noting alignment with the comprehensive plan and zoning district requirements. The property presented challenges with jurisdictional wetlands and portions located in FEMA flood zones, including a special flood hazard area.

The discussion revealed that the original PUD, dating back to around 2005 or 2007, had expired, rendering the previous zoning invalid and necessitating the rezoning for agricultural purposes. The applicant’s agent articulated a desire to return the property to its rural roots, emphasizing that the proposed zoning would restrict intensive agricultural uses that could negatively impact neighboring properties. Public sentiment, voiced by a resident, largely favored maintaining the area’s rural integrity, expressing concerns over potential large-scale housing developments.

Simultaneously, the commission considered other zoning map amendment requests, including a change from commercial retail to commercial general for a property on Philips Derry Road in Palatka. This amendment aims to support the development of a trade worker office and outdoor storage facility. The landowner expressed optimism about Putnam County’s growth. The commission unanimously recommended approval, which will advance to the county commissioners for a decision next year.

Another project involved a zoning amendment from commercial professional office to residential 1A for a parcel on Davis Lake Road. This change intends to facilitate single-family residential development, addressing the property’s non-conforming status and limited development options.

The commission also grappled with the complexities introduced by recent legislative changes, particularly Senate Bill 1080, which imposes tighter timelines for issuing building permits post-preliminary plat approvals. The commission emphasized the need for proactive measures to ensure compliance with state statutes while preserving local governance in the planning process.

A recurring theme was the need for improved clarity and documentation of policies, particularly concerning application review timelines and processes. The legislative adjustments were seen as a challenge to the current system, prompting suggestions for workshops to better understand and navigate the new regulatory landscape. Participants highlighted the necessity of a collaborative approach between staff and the planning commission to address these evolving challenges effectively.

Finally, ongoing challenges with a development project by Dr. Horton were discussed, with multiple reviews by the Development Review Committee (DRC) required for preliminary approval. The project needed updates to comply with the existing land development code and the planned unit development agreement.