Raritan Planning Board Meeting: Subdivision Controversy Leads to Withdrawal and Redirection

In a recent Raritan Planning Board meeting, an application regarding a property with multiple non-conforming structures led to the withdrawal of the application. The property, consisting of three dwellings on a single lot, faced zoning violations due to its non-conforming status, prompting the applicant to seek a subdivision to rectify the issue. However, concerns about environmental constraints and the self-created nature of the problem resulted in plans to reapply to the zoning board.

17:43The primary focus of the meeting was the application to subdivide a property with three existing residences into individual lots, addressing a zoning violation for having multiple structures on a single family residential lot. The applicant’s representative explained that the goal was to resolve the non-conforming status by creating separate lots for each dwelling. However, board members raised concerns about environmental constraints, such as flood plains, riparian zones, and wetlands, which heavily encumber the property. The proposal to construct septic systems within these sensitive areas also sparked debate, with board members questioning the adequacy of the submitted soil tests and permeability reports.

16:33Discussion further revealed that the existence of three houses on the tract, originally a single family residential lot, lacked proper zoning documentation or a certificate of non-conforming use. The applicant’s inability to provide concrete evidence, such as historical permits or reliable witness testimony, complicated the situation. Board members suggested that the issue was self-created due to the lack of conformity with current zoning laws, and the proper course of action might involve seeking a non-conformity certificate or a d1 use variance from the zoning board.

34:10Acknowledging the board’s feedback, the applicant decided to withdraw the current application. They expressed intentions to apply to the zoning board for alternative relief, either through a certificate of non-conformity or a d1 use variance, to address the property’s zoning violations appropriately.

35:54During the public comment section, a neighboring property owner expressed concerns about potential future developments that could place a dwelling between their house and the street.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: