The initial and most discussion revolved around the selection of a suitable site for the proposed active living center, weighing the merits of Simon’s Way and Oakland Road. The committee grappled with concerns about soil testing, particularly at Simon’s Way, where the soil condition presents an unknown variable that could potentially lead to the discovery of hazardous materials, similar to issues at the Nike Site and the rifle range.

Another subject was the size of the new facility. Members debated how to present the square footage of usable program space to the public, aiming to justify the expansion from the current 2,600 square feet to a proposed 20,000 square feet. The accuracy of this representation was considered crucial, as was the decision to include or exclude administrative areas in these figures.

The committee also tackled the structure and content of a slide presentation intended for the select board. Deliberations included the potential restructuring of slides, the inclusion of images for visual appeal, and the effective communication of the committee’s progress and community feedback. Members provided feedback on slides summarizing results from community forums, surveys, and site visits to other local centers, stressing the importance of demographic information and the clear presentation of feedback received.

Concerns about the Council on Aging’s representation in the decision-making process were raised, with members expressing the need to review the composition of the building committee in accordance with the bylaws. The potential for loss of representation was noted as a key issue.

Transportation for seniors emerged as a salient topic, with discussions on implementing a mini-bus service, taking inspiration from a similar service in Salem.

In addition to the aforementioned discussion points, the committee exchanged views on the need for an OPM and the role this position would play in guiding the schematic drawings process. The OPM’s involvement was regarded as a component in steering the project through its next phases and addressing challenges such as soil testing and project management.

The meeting also touched on financial considerations and the engagement of community volunteer groups, including historic and recreation groups. The importance of recreation in the community center was highlighted, with a view to emphasizing this aspect in the project’s development.

Finally, the committee reviewed the historical and PBC updates, deliberating on the inclusion of additional imagery in the presentation. They also addressed the necessity of meeting with abutters and discussed the financial form.