The subgroup meeting dedicated to sustainability was characterized as somewhat confusing, with the conversation centering on the potential for geothermal systems. The debate involved concerns regarding the uncertainty of rebate programs beyond 2032, with some members expressing apprehension about the program’s expiration and the implications it may hold for the project’s financials. On the other hand, there was a consensus on the critical nature of completing the project within the timeframe to capitalize on the reimbursement opportunities, which are tied to wellfield sizing. Additionally, the discussion entailed the possibility of preemptively drilling geothermal wells before the construction of the building to prevent interference with other systems.

Supplementing the sustainability discourse, the board addressed the process of obtaining rebates for geothermal heat pump systems, focusing on eligibility and payment procedures. In the realm of student engagement, the coordination of student introductions to the board meetings was organized. The designer provided vital updates on the draft comments for the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) review, further clarifying the funding eligibility of specific spaces within the proposed design.

Moving forward with the school building project, the board voted to confirm the full prekindergarten program as the preferred schematic design option and approved four design options for further evaluation. A memo discussing recent appointments to the committee was reviewed, which referenced Mass General law, MSBA requirements, and the defined role of the KellSchool building committee in the overarching process.

The structure and formation of the committee responsible for the school project were also a focal point of the meeting, with emphasis on the membership and roles of both voting and non-voting members. The committee’s makeup is distinctive, incorporating voting members from various town and school entities, alongside non-voting staff members who serve as consultants. The meeting delved into the unique setup of the committee, comparing it to other town entities such as the senior center and discussing the bylaws and state requirements that influence its composition. Documents from the MSBA, Town Council, and the Massachusetts Association of School Committees (MASC) that outlined the roles and responsibilities of the committee and its members were also considered.

The chair of the committee was acknowledged for their unique contribution and the considerable time and effort dedicated to the project. This sentiment was supported by members of the administrative team, who praised the chair’s leadership and the positive impact on the project’s progress.

In addition to the project-related discussions, the Reading Select Board addressed the perception of the board within the community, expressing a collective desire to maintain focus on their work and to present the best possible image to the public. Acknowledgement of new appointees to the committee was made, and the board approved the meeting minutes with a modification. Future agenda items, including an upcoming high school tour and updates on sustainability and mechanical systems, were also mentioned.