The most pressing topic at the meeting involved an application for a property on Ash Street, represented by attorney Josh Leon on behalf of SGSG Realty LLC, associated with the Cresta family. Leon proposed demolishing the existing legal non-conforming two-family dwelling, built around 1890, and constructing a new two-family dwelling that aligns with current zoning requirements. He emphasized that the new construction would address front yard setbacks and improve compliance with local zoning laws. The existing structure, although historically used as a two-family residence, did not meet the current zoning regulations in the S-15 district, where two-family dwellings are prohibited.

Leon provided historical documentation, including street listings dating back to 1936, to support the property’s longstanding use as a two-family dwelling. He assured the board that the new structure would not be more detrimental to the neighborhood than the current use, highlighting the diversity of the surrounding area, which includes a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial properties. Leon addressed concerns about hazardous materials like asbestos and lead paint, assuring that modern building practices would mitigate these issues.

Board members inquired about the historical context and the non-conformity of the property. Leon confirmed that the property had always operated as a two-family dwelling before any zoning changes. No public objections were raised during the hearing. A member moved to grant the special permit for the demolition and reconstruction, citing compliance with zoning regulations and the historical context. The motion, which included standard construction permit conditions, was unanimously approved.

The meeting then shifted focus to the second application concerning 943 Main Street, presented by Daniel Huntington. Huntington sought a special permit to change the pre-existing non-conforming use of the property from automotive repair to pest control services. The board swore in attendees and began the discussion about the proposed transition. Huntington emphasized that the pest control business, Eastern Pine Pest Control, would be less detrimental to the community than the previous automotive use.

During the presentation, Huntington and a representative from Eastern Pine Pest Control detailed the minimal on-site operations, noting that the garage would primarily be used for office purposes and storage of supplies. Concerns were raised about the storage of insecticides and pesticides, with one board member questioning whether a special permit was necessary. Huntington clarified that most products would remain in trucks, with small quantities stored in locked boxes.

Public comments revealed mixed opinions. Michael Sandberg, a neighbor, raised concerns about the lack of signage indicating chemical storage, which could pose risks to firefighters in emergencies. Huntington acknowledged the need for appropriate signage. Another resident, Margaret Cowell, voiced concerns about the potential toxicity of chemicals to local wildlife and pets, particularly in a neighborhood with children and wetlands. Huntington reassured that the chemicals used are low-toxicity and primarily organic.

The board discussed historical zoning decisions affecting the property, noting previous denials and approvals related to its use. Questions arose about whether the current non-conforming use had been active for the required 24 months, impacting the ability to continue the existing use. Concerns about noise, traffic, and environmental impact were deliberated, with some board members emphasizing the quieter nature of the pest control business compared to an auto repair shop.

The board proposed several conditions for the pest control business, including restricting activities to storage and pest services, limiting the number of vehicles parked overnight, and ensuring trash is secured to prevent wildlife issues. A motion to grant the special permit with these conditions was seconded and passed with a vote of four out of five members in favor.