The application by MPG Holdings LLC, represented by Leonard Gorski, sought a variance for the conversion of the first-floor office space into a residential unit. The planned renovations for the space included the installation of a new kitchen, bathroom, and residential-type windows. However, the board members were initially divided on the proposal, with some questioning the suitability of the space for residential purposes and the proximity of the apartment to the sidewalk. Concerns were also raised about the implications on privacy and aesthetics due to the design and size of the windows.

The debate extended to the appropriateness of transforming residential homes into tenements, as well as the impact of this change on the neighborhood’s character. Despite these issues, the board recognized the persistent difficulty in renting out the space and acknowledged the ongoing weak retail market on Shrewsbury Avenue. In light of these challenges, the conversion was seen as a potential solution to activate the street with residential use and to address the long-term vacancy problem.

During the discussion, a traffic engineer assessed the potential impact of the proposed change on parking and traffic, concluding that the conversion would not substantially impact the immediate area. Additionally, a licensed professional planner testified, supporting the application by highlighting the surrounding area’s existing residential units on the first floor and citing the benefits of activating the street. The planner also addressed the positive and negative criteria, emphasizing that the proposed change would bring minimal detriments while offering significant benefits.

Public comments included statements from attendees who understood the board’s concerns but pointed out the property’s protracted vacancy. Ultimately, the board made a motion to approve the application with conditions, including compliance with promises made during the hearing, adherence to affordable housing rules and contributions, and the acquisition of necessary permits and outside approvals. The motion was seconded, and the vote passed.

In another notable decision, the board administratively approved changes for a property on Mon Street, which included increasing the size of undersized units and eliminating setback variances. This decision was with the condition that the changes are subject to review and do not impact affordable housing obligations.

The board also reviewed an application for 41 Reckless Place, proposing to replace an existing garage with a new three-car garage and an additional surface parking space. Variances related to the garage size and setbacks were discussed, with the architect emphasizing the design features, such as windows and color matching with the existing building. The board’s engineer confirmed no concerns from a stormwater perspective, and although the public and board members were given the opportunity to ask questions, the transcript concluded before a decision was recorded.

Additionally, a proposal from Veterans Park Company for a sign on Broad Street sparked debate. The sign, requiring variances for square footage, face dimension, internal illumination, and height, was discussed in detail. The applicant argued for the use of a backlit sign with LEDs, intended to minimize reflection compared to traditional ground lighting. Concerns were raised about the sign’s height and the potential for light spillage, with some board members suggesting a reduction in size. After discussion about the design and lighting details, the board considered conditions for approval, including limitations on lighting and size and the submission of revised plans detailing the lighting specifics.