Red Bank Zoning Board Debates Liquor Store Use Variance, Approves Residential Addition

At the recent Red Bank Zoning Board meeting, the primary focus centered on the contentious application for a use variance by Spruce Liquors and the approval of a residential addition on St. Nicholas Place. The board discussed the liquor store’s impact on the community, weighing concerns about its size and potential effects on local small businesses against arguments for revitalizing a stagnant property. Meanwhile, a bulk variance was granted for a residential extension due to the property’s non-conforming lot size.

03:04The application for Spruce Liquors sparked a debate among board members. The proposed use variance for a new liquor store location raised concerns about its potential impact on neighboring small businesses and the community’s character. Members who opposed the variance cited the store’s size as incompatible with the area’s small business landscape. Others highlighted that the existing building is already oversized and that no new exterior construction was planned. They argued that the building’s long-vacant state made the proposed liquor store a viable option for revitalization. The board ultimately approved the use variance, contingent upon several conditions, including a commitment to architectural enhancements, parking lot improvements, and an anti-loitering policy. The applicant was also required to return for a site plan review to finalize the details.

20:14In contrast, the application for a residential addition on St. Nicholas Place was straightforward and met with unanimous approval. The property owner sought to add a 225-square-foot room to accommodate a growing family. The addition was planned over an existing patio. Though the lot was slightly undersized, requiring a bulk variance, the board found that all conditions and setbacks for the addition were met. The decision was supported by the board’s acknowledgment of the need for family space and the owner’s compliance with zoning regulations.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: