One notable matter involved an application to convert a long-standing dental office into a residential structure, either as a two-family home or a mother-daughter apartment. The board grappled with the lack of a formal definition for “mother-daughter” units within Red Bank’s zoning regulations, leading to an extensive discussion about the necessity of clear internal connections between living spaces. The absence of a clear definition complicated the board’s decision-making process, as members sought to ensure that any approved use would not lead to unintended consequences, such as illegal apartment conversions.

The application also prompted discussions around the anticipated introduction of an ADU ordinance, which could redefine how such properties are classified and regulated. The board acknowledged the potential for state law to mandate such ordinances. One board member highlighted the forward-looking nature of this initiative, stating, “that’s the big next phase that we want to move towards to accommodate those that want to downsize and live in a more affordable unit.”

During the deliberations, the board explored the logistics of converting the property, including the implications of having separate utilities. It was suggested that should the application be approved, separating utilities might be necessary to comply with future ADU classifications. The conversation also touched on the potential grandfathering of the property under any new regulations, should the conversion proceed before the introduction of the ADU ordinance.

Board members expressed concerns about setting a precedent with this application, emphasizing the importance of evaluating each proposal on its individual merits. The prospect of the property being sold in the future raised additional concerns, particularly regarding the potential for new owners to alter the property’s use in ways that might contravene zoning laws. The board debated the benefits of requiring deed restrictions to ensure the property remained within the intended use, thus preventing it from becoming a commercial rental space.

Ultimately, the board voted on the application, approving it with six affirmative votes and one dissenting. The approval included conditions for compliance with affordable housing regulations and obtaining necessary building permits within a specified timeframe. Additionally, the motion stipulated a certification that the work adhered to the approved plans.

Following this discussion, the board addressed another application concerning a property on Hilltop Terrace. The proposal involved extending an existing bedroom and adding a single-car garage. The board examined the visual impact of a front-facing garage, given the property’s layout, and ensured that no trees would be removed for construction. This application was met with less contention, as the applicant confirmed no opposition from neighbors, leading to a unanimous approval by the board.