At the heart of the meeting was the debate over a special permit application for a composting operation on Chase Road. Residents expressed concerns about the odors emanating from the facility, which they described as unbearable and likened to the smell of “animal death.” This issue has reportedly forced families to keep their windows closed and avoid outdoor activities. The applicant, John Melo, who operates a cattle farm on the site, has been composting for over two decades. However, community members criticized the use of certain materials in the composting process, such as clam byproducts, which have historically contributed to the odor issues.

Multiple residents, including those from nearby Chase Parker Estates, detailed their experiences with the odors and the impact on their quality of life. One resident recounted incidents of hosting events only to have guests driven indoors by the smell. Another highlighted the presence of seagulls attracted by the composting operation, which has become a nuisance. The board was urged to impose strict conditions on the permit or deny it altogether, with residents demanding measures like noise and odor monitoring at the applicant’s expense.

The potential increase in truck traffic due to the composting operations also fueled concerns. Residents argued that the current truck traffic was already a burden, with trucks reportedly arriving at odd hours, adding noise to the odor complaints. The board discussed the implications of truck operations on the community, particularly during peak hours, and considered the potential strain on local infrastructure such as roads and bridges.

The meeting also featured discussions on the regulatory framework governing the operation. The zoning enforcement officer highlighted the need for a special permit for any composting or recycling activities that do not strictly conform to agricultural use. This point was emphasized given that the property is located within a general use zone district, requiring specific permits. The conversation delved into the legality and appropriateness of the composting activities under current agricultural designations, with residents urging the board to ensure compliance with local and state regulations.

Public comments were dominated by calls for greater oversight and transparency. Some residents accused the board of being too lenient and called for stricter enforcement of existing regulations. The board was urged to consider the long-term impact of the composting operation, with concerns about potential property value depreciation and health risks related to bioaerosols from the composting process. There were also calls to review the adequacy of current fines for violations, which some argued were insufficient to deter non-compliance.

In response to community concerns, the board emphasized the importance of balancing agricultural interests with community welfare. The board members acknowledged the challenges in enforcing conditions and the need for careful deliberation in decision-making.

Another topic of discussion was the proposed depackaging recycling facility, which would process expired packaged food into feed for cattle. The board explored whether the operation fell under agricultural use or if it required a special permit as a manufacturing activity. Concerns were raised about the volume of food processed and its ultimate destination, with implications for traffic and environmental impacts.