A major point of contention was the proposed construction of a boat ramp at Wendel Place. Residents, including Diana Gonzalez of the Clark Reservoir Committee, voiced strong opposition, citing safety risks and the potential for increased criminal activity. Gonzalez noted that narrow roads and a lack of sidewalks in the Wendell Community could make the area particularly hazardous, especially for children. Echoing these concerns, Patrick Delaney highlighted the financial implications, warning that the county’s liability for the Parkway bridge could result in legal actions affecting taxpayers. Delaney mentioned that a petition against the boat ramp had gained substantial support.

Another resident, Nancy Twas, warned of increased risks for accidents such as capsizing and drowning, which could strain local emergency services. Susan Bruno added personal weight to these concerns by recounting a tragic drowning incident from her youth, arguing that the boat ramp would disrupt the quiet neighborhood and threaten local wildlife. Brian Tall, a councilman, stressed the need for the Planning Board to respect community sentiments and reconsider the plan, referencing prior decisions to use the site for a children’s museum as more aligned with residents’ interests.

Beyond the contentious boat ramp, the meeting also delved into technical aspects of the reservoir improvements. The dredging plan aims to remove approximately 155,000 cubic yards of sediment from the reservoir’s headwaters, West Lake, and Central Lake. This process includes relocating fish to minimize ecological disruption. The county representatives explained that dredging would restore the historical hard bottom of the lakes, although future dredging needs remained uncertain.

The proposal also includes recreational enhancements such as new boat ramps, a fishing pier, and kayak access structures at Central Lake. Questions arose regarding the types of boats allowed, with confirmation that fossil fuel-powered boats would be prohibited. Instead, the focus would be on kayaks, rowboats, and paddleboards. The potential for events at the facility was discussed, though specifics remained undecided.

Environmental considerations formed a part of the dialogue, with questions about the project’s impact on local wetlands and wildlife habitats. Residents sought clarity on the extent of wetland disturbances and the project’s compliance with regulatory limits. Concerns about tree removal were addressed with assurances of a two-to-one replacement ratio. Mark PE 32, a participant, emphasized the need for thorough ecological impact assessments, particularly concerning endangered species and local wildlife such as wild turkeys and deer.

Questions about trail improvements were also raised. The plan focuses on Central Lake, with pedestrian bridges and a retaining wall for grading. However, the trail system’s lack of connectivity to nearby community facilities, such as the high school or Clark Library, prompted board member inquiries about future accessibility. Concerns about increased foot traffic through the Little League complex, particularly during the busy spring season, were also discussed.