The most pressing topic of the council meeting was the proposed water and sewer rate hike. The increase, set at 9.7%, was explained as a necessity following the exhaustion of funds from the American Rescue Plan Act and other stabilization sources, which had kept rates at a lower 4.25% over recent years. The city’s financial officer emphasized the importance of moving away from using one-time funds to stabilize rates, stating that the increase was essential to balance revenues and expenditures.

Council members raised concerns about the impact of this substantial increase on residents, particularly those on fixed incomes. One highlighted that such an increase might lead to ongoing rate hikes in subsequent years, while another questioned the possibility of using the remaining $3.5 million water and sewer stabilization account to alleviate the rate hike’s burden. In response, the financial officer expressed caution in further reducing this fund.

The discussion also touched on the city’s infrastructure improvements, which, although critical, were less visible than other city projects. Nearly all water lines had been realigned, and leak detection efforts were ongoing. Despite these efforts, some council members expressed frustration and concern over the financial burdens imposed by the rate increase, with one councilor noting that seniors might consider selling their homes due to rising costs.

Public sentiment echoed these concerns. Some residents communicated their distress about the impending increase, emphasizing that it could be particularly challenging for those on fixed incomes. The council acknowledged these worries and discussed the possibility of tiered rate increases in the future to provide a more gradual adjustment for residents.

Beyond the water and sewer rates, the council also engaged in discussions about the school department’s transportation budget. Concerns were raised over the $8 million allocated for student transportation, with proposals to cut $1 million from this budget. It was noted that significant reductions had already been made, with $7.7 million earmarked specifically for special education transportation. Ultimately, a motion to reduce the school budget by $1 million failed, as the majority of council members voted against it, citing potential layoffs and the need for careful fiscal management.

The meeting also addressed the funding of the annual Sand Sculpting Festival. A council member proposed a $20,000 cut from the requested $140,000 appropriation, emphasizing accountability while acknowledging the festival’s community significance. Despite the debate, the proposal was not adopted, and the council approved the original funding request, recognizing the festival’s role in supporting local businesses and fostering community engagement.

Additionally, the council considered the opioid abatement trust fund, approving a $143,000 appropriation to support harm reduction, prevention work, and housing initiatives. The spending plan was developed with input from community stakeholders and aimed to address pressing public health needs.

Lastly, the council paid tribute to Richard Serino Senior, a beloved community figure, by unanimously supporting a motion to name a corner in his honor. The council also discussed various other community issues, including a request for a special permit for a new development, concerns over the use of fireworks, and residential parking regulations.