The council’s debate on ADU regulations was driven by a recent state mandate requiring municipalities to accommodate these units. The primary goal was to integrate ADUs into existing neighborhoods without compromising their character. The discussion was extensive, covering parking restrictions, dimensional standards, and floodplain considerations. The council sought to refine the ADU regulations, emphasizing the necessity to adhere to state law while maintaining community standards.

Parking emerged as a critical concern, with restrictions proposed based on proximity to public transportation. If an ADU was within a half mile of a bus stop, no off-street parking would be allowed. For those outside this radius, a single parking space could be permitted, provided the property could accommodate it. This regulation was intended to reduce vehicle reliance and alleviate congestion in already crowded areas. However, the proposal faced objections from citizens, such as Anthony Piali, who argued that restricting off-street parking could exacerbate street congestion.

The dimensional standards for detached ADUs also drew attention, especially the proposed height limitation of 15 feet. This restriction effectively precluded the construction of two-story units, prompting calls for greater flexibility to comply with state requirements. Additionally, a detached ADU was required to be at least 10 feet away from the principal structure.

Floodplain considerations added another layer of complexity. The council debated whether residents could build detached ADUs in flood zones if prohibited from constructing basement units. The zoning ordinance specified that no ADU should be permitted below the FEMA 100-year base flood elevation. Furthermore, the regulation limited detached ADUs to occupy no more than 25% of a rear or side yard. Council members considered amending this limit to 35% for properties within the floodplain.

Curb cuts, a term referring to new driveway entrances, were another contentious issue. A council member expressed concerns about increasing parking problems in neighborhoods with limited street parking. An amendment was proposed to allow driveway permits only on the no-parking side of the street, providing a compromise to preserve existing parking availability.

The meeting also included a discussion on the special permit request for 870 Broadway, where a commercial garage was to be converted into a contractor storage yard. The applicant, representing a spray foam insulation business, requested to store six vehicles on-site. Councilors stressed the importance of limiting storage strictly to the specified vehicles, preventing potential misuse of the site. Conditions were drafted to enforce off-street parking for employees, restrict operational hours, and ensure compliance with safety codes.