The main focus of the meeting was a motion to amend the Parks and Recreation ordinance, which sought to redefine the roles and responsibilities within the department and introduce an advisory commission. The proposed changes included clarifying the director’s duties, encouraging organic play, and utilizing technology for better public interaction. However, the amendments faced scrutiny from council members questioning the necessity and impact of these changes on existing operations.

The council debated the formation of an advisory commission, which would function similarly to the Elder Affairs commission, offering suggestions rather than wielding decision-making power. Proponents argued it would facilitate community input and enhance departmental processes. However, concerns were raised about the potential undermining of the Parks and Recreation Director’s authority, leading some members to oppose the amendments.

Despite attempts to amend specific sections of the ordinance, including bifurcating parts for further discussion and revising timelines for director responsibilities, the amendments were not approved. As a result, the motion to amend failed, and the ordinance remains in committee for further refinement.