Revere City Council Grapples with Zoning Changes Amid Concerns Over MBTA Compliance
- Meeting Overview:
The Revere City Council meeting on March 2nd, 2026, was dominated by debates over proposed changes to zoning ordinances, the approval of bond authorizations for infrastructure projects, and applications for new residential and commercial developments. Discussions about zoning changes raised concerns regarding compliance with state laws, while infrastructure bond authorizations passed without opposition.
The meeting’s most critical discussion revolved around a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance under Title 17, which threatened the city’s compliance with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) community state law. This law mandates that at least 25% of housing stock must be built by right through zoning codes. Tom Skowski, the Chief of Planning and Community Development, highlighted the potential consequences of the proposed changes. He explained that altering zoning classifications from “Yes” to “Special Permit” could jeopardize the city’s compliance. This shift would move the responsibility for approving single and two-family housing projects from the building commissioner to the city council, potentially complicating the process for property owners. Skowski noted that 96% of the city’s parcels did not comply with at least one zoning ordinance dimension. Despite these warnings, no formal opposition to the changes was recorded during the meeting.
In addition to zoning concerns, the council conducted public hearings on bond authorizations related to compliance with a Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) consent decree. The first bond, valued at $1.25 million, was intended for a planning project associated with the new high school site. The second bond, for $500,000, focused on upsizing and relaying a sewer force main. Both bond authorizations were approved unanimously, although council members expressed frustration over the financial burdens imposed by federal mandates, with one member likening the situation to “lighting money on fire.”
The council also deliberated on the application from Mario Zapage to construct two townhouse dwellings on Washington Avenue. The project faced scrutiny, particularly concerning the design of driveways and potential safety hazards at a busy intersection. Councilors raised concerns about cars backing out of the driveways and potential collisions, with suggestions for barriers to prevent accidents. Others expressed reservations about the proximity of the development to the curvature of the road, citing zoning regulations that restrict driveway placement near road curves. Although there was some support for the project, safety concerns and zoning compliance issues contributed to a divided opinion among council members.
The meeting addressed another development proposal to reconstruct a deteriorating building over a century old into a nine-unit apartment complex on Stanton Avenue. The proposed four-story structure would include parking on the first floor, with residential units above. While the developers committed to improvements such as rodent mitigation, landscaping, and enhanced trash management, concerns about infrastructure adequacy and potential overbuilding were raised. Some councilors emphasized the importance of adequate water and sewer lines to support the new development, with requests for infrastructure upgrades. Despite efforts to address neighborhood concerns, one councilor opposed the project, citing the small lot size and potential negative impact on the neighborhood.
Another subject of interest was a motion to establish a medical equipment loan program through the elder affairs and public health departments. The program would enable seniors and residents recovering from procedures to borrow items like wheelchairs and walkers at no cost. Though the initiative received support, practical concerns about logistics, cleanliness, and personnel were raised. The director of the senior center noted existing programs that already assist residents, questioning the necessity of a city-run initiative. The matter was referred to the Human Services Committee for further discussion.
The council also considered a proposed amendment to its rules of order to enhance transparency regarding community meetings. The motion, which aimed to ensure all council members receive notifications of meetings held by private applicants or non-city entities, ultimately failed despite arguments for increased coordination and resident input.
Finally, the council reviewed and approved appointments to various city positions and discussed a proposal to offer free two-hour parking for seniors at metered spots. The parking initiative, intended to ease difficulties for seniors during events at the senior center, was forwarded to the economic development committee for further consideration.
Patrick M. Keefe Jr.
City Council Officials:
Anthony Cogliandro, Ira Novoselsky, Anthony T. Zambuto, Marc Silvestri, Michelle Kelley, Juan Pablo Jaramillo, Robert J. Haas, Iii, Joanne McKenna, Paul Argenzio, Angela Guarino-Sawaya, Chris Giannino
-
Meeting Type:
City Council
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
03/02/2026
-
Recording Published:
03/02/2026
-
Duration:
94 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
Massachusetts
-
County:
Suffolk County
-
Towns:
Revere
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 03/09/2026
- 03/09/2026
- 89 Minutes
- 03/09/2026
- 03/09/2026
- 45 Minutes
- 03/09/2026
- 03/09/2026
- 88 Minutes