The most contentious topic of the meeting was the proposed installation of speed tables on Lincoln Street, which sparked debate and highlighted divisions among residents. Michael Lpri, representing a group of Lincoln Street residents, opposed the speed tables, arguing that they would exacerbate safety hazards rather than mitigate them. He questioned the legitimacy of a neighborhood vote that narrowly favored the installation, pointing out that only 15 out of 25 households participated, with an outcome of eight votes in favor and seven against. Lpri criticized this voting process and called for more direct involvement from the council and mayor in the decision-making.

Concerns were also raised about the impact of ongoing tree removals and sidewalk repairs on pedestrian safety. Lpri noted the lack of a comprehensive survey to assess current traffic patterns, particularly given the increased traffic volume on Lincoln Street, which he claimed exceeds New Jersey’s legal threshold for such installations. He emphasized that previous installations of speed tables were removed due to their ineffectiveness, questioning why this solution was being reconsidered without thorough investigation.

Another resident, Beth, echoed these concerns and sought clarification on whether a contract for the speed tables had already been awarded. She expressed skepticism about the rapid timeline for securing a contractor and demanded transparency regarding the Request for Proposals (RFP) process. Beth advocated for broader community involvement in the decision-making process. She highlighted the need for input from various stakeholders, including emergency services and the school bus provider, stressing the importance of aligning the project with the town’s master traffic plan.

Beth proposed that instead of speed tables, the council should prioritize installing sidewalks to ensure pedestrian safety, particularly for school children. She argued that designated walking areas could mitigate risks more effectively than speed impediments.

The meeting also addressed the broader issue of public engagement, with residents pointing out that not everyone feels comfortable attending public meetings, potentially limiting input from those most affected by proposed changes. Suggestions were made to explore more inclusive communication methods to ensure comprehensive resident feedback in future planning.

In addition to traffic safety concerns, the meeting involved discussions about water and sewer rates, particularly the adjustments aimed at achieving market equity. The water rates have remained stable at $100, prompting inquiries about the reasons behind gradual increases to avoid financial strain on residents. Questions were raised about whether large buildings were being charged equitably for sewer usage. The council clarified that charges are based on metered usage.

The meeting also covered new construction projects, such as the Becker Farm Road development, where it was confirmed that each apartment unit would have its own water meter. This change aims to ensure appropriate compensation based on actual water usage. Ordinance 355-2022, amending the water and sewer rates, was passed without opposition, and other ordinances regulating charitable clothing bins and prohibiting parking on specific streets were also adopted.

The council reviewed several resolutions, including those recognizing local organizations for their contributions to the community and addressing police contracts. A training session for technical assistance scheduled for December 4 received unanimous approval. The mayor extended Thanksgiving wishes and encouraged participation in an upcoming townwide luminary project.

The meeting concluded with committee reports congratulating Officer Bell for his marathon completion and charitable involvement, and highlighting the fire department’s participation in a holiday parade. During a second round of public comments, a resident raised concerns about the final wiring of a project expected to take place over the weekend.