The ordinance, which relates to the marijuana evaluation committee, was opened for a public hearing before the council’s vote for adoption. Discussions heatedly revolved around the moral and social responsibilities of the council, as well as the legal and regulatory aspects of allowing such establishments. While one council member voiced apprehensions about the potential negative impact on the town’s reputation and the message it might send to children, another highlighted that the sale of marijuana is now legal in New Jersey. It was noted that the borough has the authority to revoke licenses if problems arise, drawing a parallel with the regulation of alcohol sales.

The council grappled with the perceived moral obligation associated with sanctioning marijuana sales and the comparison of its regulation to that of alcohol. Moreover, public safety concerns were raised in relation to the approval of a retail establishment on Route 28. Previous traffic issues and fatalities on this route added gravity to the debate.

During the public portion of the meeting, a resident’s complaint about noise from high school football games near a residential area unexpectedly segued into a discussion on the impact of a proposed cannabis dispensary, especially its proximity to schools. Despite differing views, the mayor contested the idea of marijuana as a gateway drug and clarified that the town had zoned for retail, not consumption. The debate also encompassed the number of dispensaries to be allowed in the town and the comparison between marijuana and alcohol as regulated substances. Residents shared mixed sentiments, with one underscoring the dangers of substances like fentanyl and another advocating for promoting a sober lifestyle.

In addition to the issue of marijuana licensing, the meeting covered a range of other topics. The council discussed the adoption of a Redevelopment plan, where the discretionary nature of the decision was emphasized, and the question of whether business tenants should be notified about the plan was debated. Another resolution that focused on designating an area as a non-condemnation area in need of redevelopment was pulled for clarification.

Public safety was another critical subject, with a listening session scheduled for April 17th to address rising concerns regarding vehicle thefts and home invasions. Proposals included setting up neighborhood watches and enhancing communication, in addition to increased police presence along Route 28 and near the Garden State Parkway.

The meeting also acknowledged community contributions and events. A proclamation for Women’s History Month honored a local woman for her dedication as a business owner, with her son highlighting her determination and achievements. Council members engaged in community events such as the rescheduling of an Easter egg hunt, a corn beef and cabbage event, and various committee meetings. The environmental commission’s initiatives, such as a repair Cafe event and the launch of community garden sign-ups, were also discussed.

Updates from the mayor addressed strategic issues like the renovation of the train station and the improvement of pedestrian safety on Route 28. Questions from the public concerning a project labor agreement for the train station renovation and the Cannabis review board’s plans for cannabis sites were fielded.