A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussions about the redevelopment project on Chestnut Street, spearheaded by TAG Development. This project is important for meeting the borough’s affordable housing requirements. The mayor introduced representatives from TAG Development, who addressed the council’s concerns directly. Chiron Roundry, a TAG representative, highlighted challenges stemming from increased affordable housing demands, which rose from 15% to 20%. This change, according to Roundry, impacts the project’s financial viability, with each affordable unit costing approximately $162,000 more, resulting in a nearly $3 million decrease in overall project value for ten affordable units.

TAG Development proposed adjustments to make the project financially viable. The rationale was that the project’s proximity to transit could justify reduced parking without affecting tenant interest. Roundry also requested a modification to the setback requirement on the fourth floor, arguing that eliminating the setback would enhance project feasibility.

The council engaged in a detailed examination of the proposed changes, seeking clarity on how these modifications would affect the project. Questions arose about project density, parking, and the architectural impact on the streetscape. Connor Hughes, a traffic consultant, supported the request for reduced parking, citing data on transit-oriented developments and reduced parking demand near transit hubs, such as the Roselle Park train station and bus lines to New York City.

Council members expressed a need for flexibility in balancing affordable housing mandates with the project’s financial sustainability.

In addition to the Chestnut Street project, the meeting also addressed broader implications of local development, particularly the impact of new housing projects on the community. A council member expressed frustration with the political climate, advocating for collaboration and fact-based decision-making. The discussion touched on financial mechanisms like Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) and Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (LURE), emphasizing informed dialogue to avoid costly legal challenges.

The council also reviewed affordable housing efforts, referencing a past lawsuit that led to new units’ construction. The discourse highlighted the borough’s limited control under judicial mandates, which dictate development terms. A recent development, referred to as Ramaroski, was cited as an example of aesthetic challenges arising from court-imposed compromises.

Public comments reflected diverse community perspectives on development. A resident expressed optimism about a new project near the train station, while others voiced concerns about the impact of electric bikes and scooters on safety. The council also discussed the potential effects of new housing on local schools, with differing opinions on how increased student enrollment would strain educational resources.

The meeting concluded with the introduction of ordinance 2828, addressing redevelopment plans for Westfield Avenue. The ordinance proposes transitioning two parcels from business to mixed-use development, including age-restricted living. The plan aims to create a pedestrian-friendly environment with adjustments to zoning regulations, parking, and open space to foster cohesive downtown design.