The recent acquisition of a property by ICE has sparked significant unrest among Roxbury residents and council members alike. The council publicly opposed the establishment of a detention facility at this location, a stance formalized in resolution 2026-029. Despite their efforts, including discussions with state and federal representatives, the council was unable to prevent the sale. Residents voiced their dissatisfaction, questioning the effectiveness of the council’s actions and its legal strategies.

One of the most contentious issues raised was the perceived conflict of interest involving Senator Anthony Buco, the township’s attorney. Residents accused him of supporting Senate Bill 1046, which aligns with federal legislation favoring ICE detention centers. They viewed this as contradictory to the township’s official stance against the facility. A speaker criticized Buco, stating that he could not defend Roxbury while drafting legislation that undermines its interests. Calls for his resignation were repeated throughout the meeting, with residents demanding an attorney whose loyalty lies solely with the township.

The council’s decision-making and strategic approach were also scrutinized. Several speakers urged the council to adopt more aggressive measures to block the facility’s development, drawing parallels to successful resistance efforts in other towns. Suggestions included revoking utility connections, using existing water and sewer agreements as leverage, and pursuing legal action under environmental laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act. Residents emphasized the need for the council to take concrete actions rather than simply expressing disapproval.

Environmental concerns were a recurring theme, with residents highlighting potential impacts on local waterways, particularly the Musconetcong River. Questions were raised about whether proper environmental assessments had been conducted and whether the council had explored all legal avenues to address these concerns. The council was urged to prioritize the community’s well-being and to consider the broader implications of allowing the facility to operate in Roxbury.

The meeting’s public comments section was charged with emotion, as residents shared personal stories and historical parallels to underscore the gravity of the situation. Aish Gupta, a democratic socialist, labeled the proposed facility a “concentration camp,” detailing alleged inhumane conditions at other detention centers. Jerry Kramer criticized the federal government’s immigration policies, drawing historical comparisons to World War II and condemning the treatment of detainees. These narratives added a moral dimension to the community’s opposition, emphasizing a collective responsibility to uphold human rights.

Speakers also addressed the broader political climate, questioning the council’s ability to represent the community’s interests effectively. Concerns about the integrity of local governance were voiced, with residents calling for transparency and accountability. The council was urged to hire an independent attorney to navigate the legal complexities and to ensure that the community’s voice is heard and respected.

In addition to the discussions surrounding the ICE facility, the meeting also featured a proclamation for Black History Month, recognizing the contributions of African Americans to the nation and the local community. However, this was overshadowed by the intense focus on the proposed detention center.