21:35The meeting’s central focus was on the district’s budget, with an in-depth examination of a reported 28% overage in particular budget categories, notably in purchased services. The board explored the reasons behind these discrepancies, discovering that the variance was largely due to the timing of payments for property insurance and long-term facilities maintenance (LTFM) repairs. These expenses were assessed over a six-month period rather than the 12 months initially budgeted for, leading to the identified overage.

Further scrutiny was directed at the Midstate special education services, with inquiries about whether the district received adequate reimbursement. The board also discussed the Post-Secondary Option (PSO) program, clarifying that while the district pays postsecondary institutions for student credits, state aid offsets these costs, primarily funding the program through state resources rather than district funds.

41:50The conversation then shifted to a proposal for budget revisions for fiscal year 25. Dr. Kristine J. Wehrkamp Herman presented two budget proposals based on different enrollment estimates. The revised budget, reflecting an increased enrollment estimate of approximately 925 students, projected general fund revenue at over $12.269 million, which was higher than previous estimates due to increased enrollment and special education revenue. Expenditures were recommended at around $12.220 million, resulting in a projected surplus of approximately $67,000. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of enrollment estimates, with frustrations expressed over conservative budgeting that had previously resulted in unexpected student losses and funding adjustments.

Another topic was the rising costs associated with employee benefits and unemployment claims, exacerbated by legislative changes allowing certain staff to apply for unemployment during summer months. These costs, along with health insurance premiums nearly 40% higher than anticipated, were cited as significant contributors to the budgetary challenges. The board considered exploring proposals from different insurance agents to secure better rates.

In an effort to foster greater collaboration and alleviate workload among board members, a proposal was made to consider implementing co-chairs instead of a single chair and vice-chair. This suggestion was based on successful experiences in other districts.

1:27:27Apart from financial discussions, the board approved a boys’ golf team co-op, allowing students from another district to join without affecting current players’ participation. The board expressed commitment to finding suitable facilities and increasing the number of meets to ensure ample competitive opportunities for students.

Donations were another notable topic, with the board accepting contributions from various sources, including the Fireman’s Fund, which donated $1,300 for the girls’ softball program and $8,000 towards the band program. The board proposed forming a committee involving staff, parents, and students to decide on fund allocation, emphasizing the importance of community involvement in these decisions.

21:35There was dialogue on the benefits of rotating leadership roles to infuse new ideas while maintaining stability for ongoing initiatives.