The meeting saw a debate over Legal Leaf, a cannabis shop whose operations have drawn community concern. Residents questioned the legality of the products sold, which include cannabis-related items like pre-rolls and flowers. One resident, Rich Muller, sought clarification on what is permissible under local ordinances, emphasizing that the community should be informed about any potential legal infractions. Concerns were also raised about the shop’s marketing tactics, which some believe target younger audiences. This sentiment was echoed by another resident who criticized the use of popular holiday characters in advertisements, fearing they might appeal to children.

Council members acknowledged the public’s concerns, with one suggesting the creation of a zoning ordinance to restrict cannabis-laced products to designated areas, thereby granting the borough more regulatory authority. The police chief clarified that Legal Leaf is not classified as a cannabis retail shop and thus operates under different regulatory standards, noting that the products contain very low THC levels.

Parallel to the discussion on cannabis, the council also faced scrutiny over the establishment of Arcana Tattoo. Residents voiced their apprehension about the presence of a tattoo parlor, with some expressing fear that it could alter the town’s character. However, a council member defended the business, arguing there is no evidence linking tattoo shops to increased crime or negative community impact. The debate touched on zoning regulations and ADA compliance, with questions raised about the necessity of restricting tattoo parlors to the second floor of buildings, which could limit accessibility.

The council deliberated on the implications of the tattoo ordinance, with one member advocating for a well-crafted law that accommodates business growth while maintaining regulatory clarity. The conversation revealed differing opinions on the need for amendments, as some council members viewed it as an opportunity for improvement rather than a failure. Ultimately, the council voted on the ordinance, with some members dissenting.

In addition to these debates, the meeting addressed procedural changes designed to foster transparency in the ordinance introduction process. A council member highlighted the importance of involving the public and all council members in discussions before voting on matters. This initiative seeks to prevent hasty decisions and ensure that diverse perspectives are considered.

The meeting also recognized the contributions of outgoing council member Maria Begg-Roberson, who was lauded for her principled leadership and service over six years. She reflected on her tenure with pride, citing her involvement in initiatives like raising the pride flag and cannabis legalization efforts. Her departure was noted as a significant loss to the council, with colleagues expressing gratitude for her dedication to public service.