Rutherford School Board Faces Community Concerns Over Textiles Program Amid Impressive School Performance Statistics

The Rutherford School Board meeting recently addressed community concerns regarding the potential discontinuation of the textiles program at Rutherford High School, amidst discussions of impressive school performance statistics and various personnel changes. The textiles program, cherished by students and alumni for its creativity and educational value, sparked debate, while the board also highlighted successful student achievements and addressed routine administrative matters.

14:13During the meeting, Julia Minervini, a passionate advocate for the textiles program, presented a petition with over 250 signatures from students, teachers, and alumni, calling for the program’s continuation. Minervini argued that the textiles course offered a valuable creative outlet and a break from academic pressures, enriching the school community. She emphasized the program’s uniqueness within the state and its importance to Rutherford High School’s educational offerings. Minervini also noted a $30,000 investment from the Rutherford Education Foundation in new sewing machines and equipment, stressing that discontinuing the program could negatively impact future financial support.

18:51In response to Minervini’s presentation, an administrative member clarified that the program had not been officially cut but was facing low enrollment for the upcoming year, with only 20 students registered. The administrator explained that offering the textiles class would necessitate reassigning a teacher from other required courses, potentially displacing students from those classes. The board expressed hope that the petition and increased community interest might boost enrollment, allowing the program to continue in the future.

06:53The meeting also covered reports from the superintendent, who shared highlights from the school performance report. Notably, Rutherford’s graduation rate stood at an impressive 97.5%, with a chronic absenteeism rate of approximately 4.5%—well below the state average of 15%. Additionally, 48% of students were enrolled in one or more Advanced Placement (AP) classes, outperforming the state average of 35%, and 80% of students participated in dual enrollment programs, earning college credit, in contrast to the state average of 26%. The superintendent also reported on the district’s recent water testing, which showed clear results except for two custodial sinks that tested positive for lead, prompting immediate action to remove them from service.

27:00Personnel changes were another focal point of the meeting, as the board approved resignations, terminations, and new appointments. Steven Met was appointed as the new supervisor of educational technology and student information. Other approvals included a Spanish teacher for Union Middle School and a leave replacement for Peron Elementary School, alongside various long-term substitute roles and staff transfers. The board discussed these changes in the context of ensuring adequate staffing and coverage in needed areas.

31:12In the curriculum and instruction segment, a total of 165 field trips were approved, and the “Stress Less Summer” program was highlighted for its positive community reception. The board also addressed financial matters, approving an increase in tuition for the Bulldog Care program due to rising operational costs, while still maintaining competitive rates. The finance committee acknowledged donations, including a $2,000 contribution from the Rutherford Elks and toys for the preschool class at Washington School.

36:19The meeting concluded with updates on buildings and grounds, focusing on a bid award for a fire alarm system replacement at Lincoln School. The board emphasized the importance of this upgrade, noting that the bids came in under budget. The meeting wrapped up with a brief public comment session and transitioned to an executive session to discuss legal issues and negotiations.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: