The proposed redevelopment project, which involves zoning changes to allow for a residential structure with 60 units, was met with apprehension from residents and council members alike. Residents expressed concerns about the density of the development and its impact on neighborhood aesthetics, traffic congestion, and infrastructure. Muhammad Henfey, a resident, voiced his unease about the physical and atmospheric impact of the proposed building, emphasizing the minimal difference between the proposed 35-foot height cap and the original 40-foot height. He highlighted concerns about water management, traffic congestion, noise, and overall quality of life in the area, questioning the council’s consideration of these issues.

Sylvia Zadelli, another resident, inquired about the town’s history with redevelopment projects, expressing skepticism about the likelihood of halting the current project. In response to these concerns, the council elaborated on the redevelopment process, noting that the planning board would review the zoning plan for consistency with the master plan before it returns to the governing body for final approval. The council acknowledged that traffic issues already plague Market Street, particularly at the intersection with Main Street, which has “only one lane each way.”

The council also addressed the community’s concerns about the project’s alignment with the town’s affordable housing obligations. The development would contribute nine units toward these obligations, with the council emphasizing the consequences of ignoring such mandates.

To address some of the community’s concerns, the developer proposed revisions to the plan, including underground parking for 120 vehicles and additional parking spaces for the police department. These adjustments aimed to mitigate the impact on traffic and parking in the area. The council highlighted the need to pressure the county for infrastructure improvements, particularly at the problematic intersection contributing to traffic issues.

The meeting also included a discussion on the financial implications of the redevelopment project. Rumors about a potential long-term payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) agreement were addressed, with a council member dismissing claims of impropriety and asserting that the anticipated revenue from the completed apartments could exceed $300,000. This would provide financial relief for existing property owners by stabilizing taxes rather than reducing them outright.

In addition to the main topic of the residential project, the council addressed several other issues. A resolution recognizing Italian-American Heritage and Cultural Month was adopted, honoring the contributions of Italian-Americans to the community. The council also discussed an ordinance amending regulations for cannabis businesses, with public comments highlighting concerns about the necessity and impact of accommodating cannabis cultivation businesses in the township. A council member acknowledged the challenges of making decisions affecting residents, emphasizing that such choices are made with the community’s best interests in mind.

The meeting concluded with discussions on community events and projects, including the nearing completion of a gas main replacement and the scheduling of paving contingent on weather conditions. Residents were encouraged to participate in upcoming events and reminded of the importance of civic engagement in the upcoming election.