Sayreville Borough Council Confronts JCP&L Over Power Outages and Street Lighting Failures

The Sayreville Borough Council meeting on April 14, 2025, focused heavily on issues with Jersey Central Power and Light (JCP&L), including street lighting and frequent power outages, alongside other topics such as property sales, budget discussions, and community development concerns.

23:20The most notable topic of the meeting was the ongoing issues with JCP&L, which have sparked frustration among council members and residents alike. A council member expressed gratitude for a resolution aimed at addressing the pervasive street lighting problems and power outages, particularly along Journey Mill Road, a known dark and dangerous curve. The member drew a stark contrast between JCP&L and the more responsive services provided by PSEG to neighboring Woodbridge. Another council member echoed these sentiments, sharing personal experiences of increased power outages over the past three years and criticizing First Energy, JCP&L’s parent company, as a “scandal-ridden utility.”

The council’s resolution seeks to maintain pressure on JCP&L, demanding accountability and improved service. A council member highlighted the need for transparency from the utility, questioning the lack of data on the number of outages and affected residents. The member urged the council to communicate these concerns to legislative representatives. This sentiment was reinforced by another council member who described the level of service in Sayreville as akin to living in a “third world country,” emphasizing the urgency of addressing these issues.

In addition to the power and lighting problems, the council discussed the Arsenal warehouses, which remain underpowered due to JCP&L’s delays in providing the necessary infrastructure for solar panels. The repeated applications filed by the Arsenal highlight ongoing frustrations with the utility’s performance.

09:34Another topic was the sale of a small parcel of land, identified as block 371 lot 2.03. Resident Jim Robinson raised concerns during the public hearing, questioning the sale to an adjacent property owner and the appraisal process. He argued that the property’s assessed value did not reflect its true market value and suggested it should sell for more than the proposed $6,000. In response, the mayor clarified that the sale followed local laws, allowing all adjacent property owners to purchase the property, which would merge with the adjacent property upon sale, eliminating standalone use.

53:43The meeting also addressed budgetary concerns, with an inquiry about the timing of the borough’s budget introduction, which should occur after March 31 per state regulations. This led to discussions about the development in Melrose, tied to an affordable housing agreement signed by a former mayor. The speaker highlighted past decisions that have led to current challenges, such as tree removal and unit specifications, which seemed misaligned with community expectations.

36:47Moreover, the council considered the use of pilot program funds for recreational program fees, with a suggestion to explore establishing a year-round recreation center for youth. The procedural matters included applications for liquor license transfers and authorizations for public safety and courtroom equipment contracts. Concerns about debris in Bailey Park and compliance with Green Acres regulations were also raised, with a call for immediate action to rectify the situation to avoid jeopardizing future grants.

01:04:38Community members expressed their interest in developing sports facilities in Sayreville. Sherry, a resident and coach, highlighted the lack of adequate training facilities for youth athletics, particularly for track and other sports. The council showed interest in her proposal, encouraging further discussion about expanding recreational facilities. The public portion concluded with an update on ongoing projects, specifically the Jerry S complex and the addition of new athletic fields.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: