Clyde Auto Recycling, a local business that acquired the junkyard in 2013, sought an extension of time for their development plan. The applicant’s representative, Clyde Cameron, detailed the efforts to improve the site, including overcoming challenges with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and setbacks due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The board scrutinized the lack of physical progress at the site and queried the current status of necessary approvals and updated cost estimates. The board’s attorney emphasized the importance of the applicant providing comprehensive information and the possibility of imposing a time limit on the approved extension.

The application’s witnesses, including licensed professional engineer Frank Farrell and environmental scientist Jack Kelly, addressed the outstanding approvals required from the county and DEP. Farrell anticipated that the county approval process would finalize within a month, while Kelly provided insights into the dealings with the DEP. He reported that a wetland letter of interpretation had expired and would need renewal, and a transition area waiver application had been withdrawn due to the DEP’s determination. The board expressed concerns about the time taken for the application’s progression and discussed the need for potential future extensions.

In addition to the extension for Clyde Auto Recycling, the board addressed a development application that had expired and required reapproval. The applicant’s representatives discussed the secured approvals and remaining hurdles, including county and DEP approvals, and the water distribution system. The board members engaged in discussions about the anticipated timelines and the potential need for extensions.

A holdover application for a property on Kayot B Road was also on the agenda. The applicant proposed a new structure for his driveway to accommodate a vehicle but faced concerns from the board regarding the size and placement of the proposed structure, particularly the garage door access. The applicant, expressing frustration with the debate, withdrew the proposal.

The meeting also included an application by CNJ Infinity LLC for the conversion of second-floor office space into two residential apartments. The applicant’s representative, Mr. Wayne TOA, presented the plan for one apartment to house his family and the other to be rented out. However, the submission of the apartment plans was unclear, prompting the board to request a copy. Professional planner Mr. John Chadwick spoke to the suitability of the building for residential use and the planned improvements. He noted that the proposed change would not alter the building’s exterior from Route 9.

The board deliberated on a proposed sign and parking rearrangements, weighing the potential impact on neighborhood development and zoning plans. Safety concerns were raised, notably regarding the lack of sidewalks and the proximity to a busy highway, especially if families with children were to reside in the apartments. The board considered the implications of the Fair Housing Act on renting the apartments and the control the property owner would have over tenant selection. Discussions also touched on the sewer line capacity in light of increased usage from the additional apartments. Ultimately, the board decided to carry the vote on this matter to the next meeting to ensure a full board’s presence and allow further contemplation of the raised concerns.