The most pressing topic during the meeting was the potential impact of the proposed development on local drainage systems. Residents voiced their concerns about existing drainage issues, exacerbated by heavy rainfall, which causes water overflow onto Washington Road. Nicholas BD from 21 Charlotte Street highlighted the inadequacy of current drainage systems, stating that without proper drainage solutions, the new development could worsen these problems. He suggested installing a sewer line as a more effective measure to manage water runoff. Another resident, Timothy CA from 17 Charlotte Street, echoed these concerns, particularly noting the absence of adequate sewer infrastructure at the nearby St. Stan cemetery, which could become a future issue if the cemetery decides to expand or add facilities.

In addressing these concerns, the applicant’s representative assured that the project would adhere to the Residential Site Improvement Standards (RSIS) regarding parking and infrastructure improvements. The representative acknowledged the need for better road conditions and committed to milling and repaving Charlotte Street, addressing some residents’ concerns about the road’s current state. The applicant also expressed a willingness to extend the water line and consider adding a fire hydrant to support local fire services.

Emergency access was another significant topic, with residents expressing worries about how the development might affect the ability of emergency vehicles to navigate the area. The existing dead-end street configuration means that emergency vehicles would need to back up, as no turnaround is available. A fire hydrant on Water Tower Lane was noted as critical for emergency access, but its availability has been questioned due to instances of blocked or non-functional hydrants.

The engineering report presented during the meeting included waivers being sought for sidewalk installation and curbing due to spatial constraints and the existing conditions of the roadway. Mark Liber from East Point Engineering testified about the project’s minor variances, emphasizing that the proposed changes would not alter the neighborhood’s character. He argued that the new corner lot created by the subdivision would be one of the largest in the area, and the variances requested were minor, mostly due to pre-existing non-conforming conditions.

Public comments further revealed residents’ concerns about parking issues and population density. A resident recounted past experiences with parking congestion on local streets, urging the board to ensure adequate parking for the new development. The proposed plan includes a basement and space for recreational features like a pool, addressing some residents’ recommendations for the new homes.

Despite the concerns raised, the Planning Board voted in favor of the application, with conditions discussed during the meeting to address infrastructure and design concerns.