01:23The meeting’s most development involved the Fulton’s Landing Redevelopment Project, where the board unanimously approved a two-year extension request for the preliminary and final major site plan. The law office of McErnney and Nance, representing Main Street 1 LLC and Main Street 2 LLC, explained that the project’s scope necessitated numerous municipal and environmental approvals, which have proven to be time-consuming.

04:05Following this, the board delved into a detailed review of application BP number 25-02 by CPMD Journey Mill Road Urban Renewal LLC. The applicant sought an amended preliminary and final site plan and subdivision for properties on Journey Mill Road. The project involves developing a former landfill site, which presents unique challenges due to its location largely within a floodplain and designated wetlands.

08:30The applicant’s requests included three waivers: regarding the intensity of lighting foot candles, the height of light poles, and the number of monument signs. Licensed professional engineer Dan Bush provided testimony, presenting exhibits of the site and detailing modifications to the building plans. He emphasized that while the front building remained consistent with prior approvals, the back building was removed due to delays in obtaining regulatory approval from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

15:15Bush further explained the necessity for design waivers, including those for retaining wall slopes and driveway width, which were aimed at deterring truck use. A waiver was also sought for sidewalk lighting standards, which did not meet borough requirements, although compliance was achieved within the site itself.

The applicant faced ongoing discussions about signage and site plans, particularly in the SED zone where the ordinance typically permits only one freestanding sign. However, the redevelopment plan’s interpretation allowed for two monument signs, which the applicant argued align with prior approvals. This was part of a broader dialogue addressing engineering comments and prior approvals, with the applicant awaiting feedback on a pending application with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

24:40Parking and traffic considerations were also topics. The increase in office space necessitated additional parking spaces, although the applicant sought flexibility to adjust parking requirements based on tenant needs. Concerns about truck circulation and fire truck access were addressed, with the applicant agreeing to revise plans to ensure compliance with fire safety standards.

32:08Stormwater management was an aspect of the discussions, with the project benefiting from compliance with regulations prior to July 2023, allowing for green infrastructure solutions. The applicant confirmed adherence to stormwater management comments.

The board also discussed accessibility of exterior doors, with a clarification that while all entrances are accessible, not all need to comply with ADA requirements. This led to a broader conversation about ADA compliance and the project’s adherence to building codes.

Additionally, the potential for solar panel installation was mentioned, aligning with New Jersey’s requirement for new constructions to be pre-wired for solar energy. The mechanical equipment’s placement sparked debate, with the applicant opposing landscaping around it to allow for ventilation and maintenance, arguing that it was not visible from public areas.

51:01In closing, the board heard public comments, with a community member expressing optimism about the project’s potential environmental benefits and economic contributions to the borough. Following the public session, the board voted unanimously to approve the application, including the requested variances and waivers.