Seaside Park Residents Voice Concerns Over New Zoning Regulations and Property Impacts
- Meeting Overview:
At the recent Seaside Park Borough Council meeting, residents raised concerns about proposed changes to zoning regulations, particularly in South Seaside Park. The meeting, which included discussions on several ordinances, saw active participation from the community, highlighting issues related to zoning amendments, property values, and development processes.
The most pressing topic revolved around three proposed ordinances concerning amendments to development regulations. These ordinances had been introduced in collaboration with the planning board and involved substantial modifications to the existing guidelines. Ordinance 22622 proposed amendments to the borough code regarding substantial damage regulations, necessitating a public hearing due to its material changes. Ordinance 22623 aimed to reduce flood elevation standards based on expert feedback, while Ordinance 22624 focused on incorporating residential zones into zoning provisions.
During the public comment period, residents expressed diverse opinions on these changes. Kevin Zedstrom, a local resident, voiced concerns that the proposed zoning amendments could lead to a “two-tiered neighborhood,” impacting property values for those who built under previous Berkeley Township standards. He suggested the council consider creating distinct rules for the South Seaside Park area to address these disparities.
Don Whiteman, another resident, highlighted discrepancies in the zoning designations, particularly related to the R50 and R315 zones. He argued that the ordinance’s current boundaries could misclassify properties, urging the council to amend the zoning lines to prevent adverse effects on property owners.
Richard Hannah, also a resident, acknowledged the council’s efforts to enhance safety and address flooding through new building standards. However, he noted challenges faced by families like his, who had been navigating the development process with Berkeley Township for an extended period. He expressed gratitude for the council’s attention but emphasized the real impacts these changes could have on families engaging in good faith.
The public comments session further revealed the anxieties of residents about the annexation process and its impact on existing zoning standards. A resident shared concerns about building a new home, noting that recent legislative changes contradicted previous understandings about zoning standards. Questions arose about whether projects already underway would be treated differently, given that the annexation had communicated that Berkeley Township’s standards would remain in effect.
A council member responded to these concerns by clarifying the situation. They explained that while Seaside Park adopted the zones as they existed under Berkeley Township’s ordinances, general zoning ordinances from Seaside Park remained applicable. This included differences in how height is measured between the two municipalities. The council member reassured residents with existing approvals from Berkeley Township that they would be allowed to proceed under those standards, while new applicants would need to adhere to the updated Seaside Park standards.
Height restrictions under the new regulations also sparked debate, with residents pointing out that the changes could potentially alter the character of the area. Under the new rules, houses would be limited to a maximum height of 28 feet, necessitating flat roofs and complicating the installation of mechanical equipment. Residents urged the council to consider these practical implications to maintain the aesthetic and functional integrity of homes in the area.
During the meeting, Mike Juliano, the planning board chairman, addressed the annexation of South Seaside Park and the development of a new master plan. He expressed enthusiasm for the integration and outlined the historical planning process, emphasizing the need for cohesive residential zoning standards. Despite his reassurance, he acknowledged some public comments as “ridiculous” and reiterated that the height restrictions were designed to be clear and fair.
Alongside zoning and development discussions, the council addressed several bond ordinances for capital improvements. These included funds for fire department and police department equipment, street reconstruction, and municipal building upgrades. The council also introduced ordinances for water and sewer utility improvements and marina utility enhancements, which passed unanimously.
In addition to the technical discussions, the meeting highlighted community events and initiatives. The council approved the “Hearts of Surfing” event scheduled for June 27, 2026, and discussed an upcoming tug-of-war event aimed at fostering community spirit and supporting local fire departments. The Environmental Advisory Committee invited the council and public to a Bay Beach Cleanup on May 30th, emphasizing environmental health and community engagement.
The meeting concluded with the approval of various resolutions, including the authorization to cancel property taxes for veterans and appointing seasonal employees for beach patrol and control. A resolution related to stormwater maintenance equipment was also discussed, with a council member noting the pay disparity for seasonal employees, particularly lifeguards versus badge checkers.
John A. Peterson Jr.
City Council Officials:
-
Meeting Type:
City Council
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
05/21/2026
-
Recording Published:
05/26/2026
-
Duration:
81 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
New Jersey
-
County:
Ocean County
-
Towns:
Seaside Park
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 05/26/2026
- 05/26/2026
- 16 Minutes
- 05/26/2026
- 05/27/2026
- 172 Minutes
- 05/26/2026
- 05/27/2026
- 40 Minutes