Seminole County Imposes Stringent Deadlines for Property Code Violations Amidst Ongoing Compliance Challenges

The Seminole Special Magistrate convened recently to address a series of property code violations, focusing on cases where compliance deadlines were extended amidst persistent non-compliance. Key topics included the imposition of fines, recommendations for lien placements, and the procedural difficulties property owners face in navigating the county’s regulatory environment.

0:00One of the most notable cases involved B&B Land Holdings, which had been non-compliant despite working with the Seminole County Building Department to secure necessary permits. The case was initially heard on October 13, 2022, with a compliance date set for January 12, 2023. However, an affidavit of non-compliance was filed, and multiple extensions were granted, the latest being December 12, 2024. During the recent meeting, it was recommended that a lien be imposed retroactively to January 8, 2025, accruing at $50 per day until compliance was achieved. The delay was attributed to a pending site plan review necessary for the issuance of a building permit. The magistrate expressed hope that the matter would be resolved by the next meeting on February 12, 2025.

24:58In another notable discussion, a property located on Ceno Way in Altamonte Springs was cited for installing a black wrought iron fence and completing slab work with plumbing and electrical connections without permits. The special magistrate recommended a compliance deadline of March 12, 2025, with fines of $50 per day for non-compliance. A representative from the local community expressed their willingness to assist the property owner, Jean Pierre, in meeting these requirements, despite the need for a variance due to the fence not adhering to height and setback regulations.

1:07:24The meeting also addressed a complex case involving an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on Oak Street, Altamonte Springs. The property owners were unaware of existing violations when they purchased the property in 2019. The magistrate underscored the importance of resolving the issue, noting that the structure exceeded size limits and was being used as a duplex, contrary to zoning regulations. The magistrate set a compliance deadline of June 2025, emphasizing the need for continuous engagement with county staff to resolve the matter.

45:47Additionally, a series of cases highlighted the difficulties property owners face in aligning existing structures with current codes. A property on Mol Lake Park Road faced ongoing challenges due to unpermitted additions and a pool. Despite efforts to secure permits, the owner expressed frustrations with the process, while a compliance deadline of March 12, 2025, was set, with potential fines for continued non-compliance.

2:36:46The magistrate also reviewed a case regarding 321 Freedom Trail, where owners were cited for unpermitted interior renovations. The property had a history of violations, resulting in a compliance deadline of March 12, 2025, with escalating fines for non-compliance. The magistrate emphasized the importance of adhering to county regulations to avoid future penalties.

0:00The magistrate consistently emphasized communication with county departments as important to expediting compliance and preventing further violations.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: