The most prominent topic was the board’s evaluation of the Hero Act, specifically regarding veterans’ exemptions. Board members considered the financial implications of supporting veterans through municipal budget allocations, debating over the appropriate percentage for benefits. The conversation explored the adequacy of existing support and whether an increase in benefits was warranted, emphasizing that any financial decisions would not affect the tax rate, as funding would come from the overlay account. However, concerns were raised that if the overlay grew, it might necessitate an increase in the tax levy, which could impact taxpayers.

One participant suggested initially approving a 50% benefit for veterans, with the possibility of revisiting this in future meetings, especially if community support grew. The board considered presenting a specific percentage in the warrant article to streamline the voting process and avoid the pitfalls of leaving a blank space for voters to fill in. Ultimately, a motion was made to recommend a 100% benefit for veterans, which passed and was framed as a recommendation to the select board. This decision was supported by assurances that the overlay account had sufficient funds to accommodate the expense.

In addition to veterans’ benefits, the board faced challenges related to staffing in the assessor’s office. Leslie Bracebridge provided updates on recruitment efforts following the April 3 meeting. She noted that the retiring assessor from Irving had declined the position, and attempts to communicate with the Pelham assessor had been unsuccessful. It was emphasized that the Pelham assessor needed to coordinate with the town administrator for clarity on their availability. The board discussed the possibility of reaching out to RRG for assistance, although no formal approach had been made due to concerns about their capacity to take on additional responsibilities.

The board also deliberated on potentially hiring Roy Bishop for a supervisory assessor position. Uncertainty loomed over Bishop’s willingness to assume the role, as it was noted that he had not previously handled all responsibilities for a town. Suggestions were made for board members to speak with Bishop directly to assess his interest and capabilities. The importance of finding an experienced individual for training was highlighted, and Bishop was seen as a valuable resource for recommendations or contacts that could aid in filling the position.

During the meeting, the board reviewed two personal exemption applications. The first, from Jared Watkins for a property on Baker Road, was denied due to a lack of proof of residency. The second, a veterans’ exemption application for a property on Lever Road, was approved without dissent after confirming all necessary documentation. Similarly, the board approved motor vehicle excise tax abatements from March and four accountant reports, confirming their accuracy.

Another agenda item was the discussion of chapter 61 applications for liens and lien releases. Leslie introduced two late submissions from previous years for chapter 61B renewals, which the board approved. There was also a conversation about a property on Wendell Road previously owned by the Greenbomb family, where the select board had released their right of first refusal. The buyer’s attorney sought clarification on a release that matched the book and page used by the select board, which the board acknowledged as necessary for clarity.

The board concluded the meeting by addressing articles related to the Hero Act, specifically chapter 178 of the acts of 2024. Discussions centered on a cost-of-living adjustment for existing veterans’ exemptions. A motion was made and passed to approve this adjustment. The board also examined another article with more financial implications, clarifying that the state would not reimburse costs as these were local options. The board planned to recommend a percentage for the exemptions to the select board for town meeting consideration.