A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussing the potential regulations for lithium battery storage systems, a topic that has gained attention due to the perceived environmental and safety risks associated with such installations. The board acknowledged the complexities involved in drafting these regulations, recognizing the need to balance environmental safety with the town’s developmental goals. Members expressed varying opinions on whether the regulation should discourage or outright prohibit battery storage applications. Concerns were raised about the potential perception of the regulations as being “unreasonable and capricious,” which could deter developers.

The board plans to collaborate closely with the planning board to gain insights and develop cohesive regulations that consider both data centers and energy storage solutions. With a special town meeting approaching, the board emphasized the importance of understanding the intersection of these interests. Members discussed the logistics of energy management from solar arrays without battery storage.

Public sentiment surrounding battery storage facilities was also a topic of concern, with references to local opposition and signs of resistance in nearby towns. The board discussed the feasibility of small installations, drawing on examples like a small battery energy storage system in Wellesley, situated on municipal property away from residences. The distinction between large commercial operations and smaller residential solutions was emphasized, with the board focusing on commercial storage tied to solar energy systems rather than domestic power walls.

In another matter, the board addressed the issue of services funded but not received. A member noted, “we have paid for three months of services that we have not gotten, and I want it back,” reflecting the board’s shared sentiment. This situation highlighted the urgency of ensuring that services funded through the safe program are delivered, with advocacy efforts planned to lobby for continued funding. The board agreed on the need to request a meeting with district representatives to discuss these concerns and ensure accountability in service delivery.

The meeting also touched on collaborative efforts with other boards and organizations to streamline processes and regulations. Mike Hugo from the Massachusetts Association of Health Boards addressed the board’s interest in enacting bylaws for new technological installations. He emphasized the importance of involving boards of health early in the process to prevent potential public health hazards and suggested establishing clear health regulations under Massachusetts law.

Additionally, the board reviewed updates from collaborative meetings, noting personnel changes within the collaborative due to staff transitioning to new roles. Despite these changes, the board remains confident in the new hires, Jim Albert and Anna Deford, who bring valuable expertise to the team. There was a consensus on the necessity of these new hires obtaining various certifications, with confidence expressed in their ability to do so promptly.

The meeting concluded with discussions about the town’s upcoming special town meeting, which will present an article proposing a moratorium on new data centers. The moratorium aims to allow the planning board time to research and develop comprehensive regulations for consideration at the annual town meeting. The board recognized the importance of collaboration between the Board of Health and the planning board to ensure cohesive regulation development, highlighting the need for open communication and shared objectives.