During the hearing, the commission’s scrutiny centered on the depth of the borings, the handling of soil and water, and the implementation of sediment erosion controls. Concerns were raised about the possibility of erosion and the dewatering process for the boreholes. The representative from BSC Group provided assurances that best management practices would be employed to mitigate any potential adverse effects on the environment, with special emphasis on protecting wetlands and minimizing disturbance. The commission requested additional clarification on the duration and specifics of the boring process, the equipment to be utilized, and the precise steps to be taken to safeguard the wetlands.

The public hearing also encompassed discussions related to an amended order of conditions for a property located on Shore Drive. Changes in the architectural design of the proposed dwelling led to a reduction in the building’s footprint and alterations to the flood plane location. Representatives for the property presented visual aids and emphasized that the reduced footprint would not affect the site work, vegetation, or stormwater management plans previously approved. After reviewing the proposed amendments, the commission closed the public hearing and scheduled the next steps for the order of conditions.

In addition to the soil boring project and the 59 Shore Drive property discussions, the commission addressed administrative changes within their ranks, including the retirement of a member and the welcoming of two new members. The newcomers introduced themselves and outlined their eagerness to participate in the commission’s efforts. They were apprised of the requirement to undergo specific training and the necessity of being added to the commission’s mailing list.

The commission also deliberated on a separate property issue regarding stormwater management and the use of a tight tank instead of a conventional septic field for waste disposal. This led to discussions about the regrading of the property, previous approvals, and the demand for revised resource area impact numbers. Furthermore, the commission discussed the need for site visits to various properties, taking into consideration the availability of the property owners and commission members.

An inquiry about the master fee schedule was raised, noting that a public hearing would be required prior to its approval. Updates on upcoming meetings were also provided, including one to discuss parking at the Quin Woodlands track and another with the Department of Public Works to discuss a Notice of Intent (NOI).